Covalent Bonding Layer for Low-Temperature Wafer Joining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional substrate bonding processes for semiconductor wafers are complex, expensive, and suffer from limited bonding strength, queue time lag, and copper oxidation issues, particularly in direct and hybrid bonding techniques.

Innovation Solution

A method involving alkyne- and azide-functionalized bonding layers on substrates that form a triazole linkage through a cycloaddition mechanism at low temperatures, eliminating the need for plasma activation and hydration processes, resulting in a stronger, non-reversible covalent bond.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional direct or hybrid bonding techniques are used, then substrate bonding can be achieved, but the process becomes complex and expensive due to plasma activation and hydration steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the plasma activation and hydration steps from the conventional bonding process. By using self-assembled monolayers with reactive functional groups that directly bond upon contact, the complex multi-step process is simplified to a single contact step, reducing process complexity while maintaining bonding reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the bonding surface by introducing self-assembled monolayers with specific functional groups (azide, alkyne, epoxide) that enable direct covalent bonding. This parameter change eliminates the need for plasma and hydration treatments, simplifying the process while ensuring reliable bonding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If plasma activation and hydration processes are implemented, then bonding capability is enhanced, but queue time lag increases due to multiple processing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding capabilityVSAvoidqueue time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-forming self-assembled monolayers with reactive functional groups on the bonding surfaces before the actual bonding event. This preliminary functionalization eliminates the need for time-consuming plasma activation and hydration steps at the time of bonding, significantly reducing queue time while maintaining enhanced bonding capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the time-consuming plasma activation and hydration steps from the bonding process timeline, replacing them with a single contact step where pre-functionalized surfaces bond directly, thereby eliminating queue time lag

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If conventional bonding interfaces are used, then substrate bonding is achieved, but bonding strength is limited and may be reversible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding adhesionVSAvoidbonding strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by combining self-assembled monolayers with specific functional groups (azide, alkyne, epoxide) that form covalent bonds with the substrate and with each other. This composite approach creates a multi-layer bonding interface with superior strength and irreversibility compared to conventional single-material bonding interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the bonding interface parameters by introducing covalent bond-forming functional groups that create strong, irreversible chemical bonds. This parameter change transforms the bonding mechanism from physical adhesion to chemical bonding, significantly enhancing bonding strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If hydration step is applied to enhance bonding, then bonding capability improves, but copper-based conductive features oxidize and resistivity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding capabilityVSAvoidcopper oxidation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the hydration step from the bonding process, replacing it with direct contact bonding of pre-functionalized surfaces. This removal prevents water exposure that would cause copper oxidation, eliminating the harmful effect while maintaining improved bonding capability through covalent bond formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates an inert environment by using self-assembled monolayers that enable bonding without water exposure. The reactive functional groups on the monolayers allow covalent bonding to occur in the absence of moisture, preventing copper oxidation while maintaining bonding capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances bonding strength, reduces processing complexity and cost, and minimizes queue time by forming a stable, non-reversible covalent bond between substrates, while avoiding copper diffusion and oxidation.

Implementation Method 1

chemically reacting the alkyne moiety with the azide moiety through a cycloaddition mechanism, thereby forming a triazole moiety-linked layer at the interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCycloaddition:

Implementation Method 2

When the bonding surfaces are brought into contact and a thermal treatment is applied, the moieties form a triazole linkage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal activation: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12582017B2Bonding layer and process
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 TOKYO ELECTRON LTD
  • US12582017B2 patent drawing
  • US12582017B2 patent drawing
  • US12582017B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes providing a first substrate with a first surface including an alkyne moiety. The method includes providing a second substrate with a second surface including an azide moiety. The method further includes bonding the first substrate to the second substrate. The bonding of the first substrate to the second substrate includes making physical contact between the first surface and the second surface at an interface and chemically reacting the alkyne moiety with the azide moiety through a cycloaddition mechanism, thereby forming a triazole moiety-linked layer at the interface.