Crosswind Compensation Control During Vehicle Turning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to effectively detect and mitigate crosswind effects when a vehicle is turning, leading to potential lane deviation and increased risk of accidents, particularly in SUVs and VANs, due to false crosswind detection and inadequate steering compensation.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus and method that utilizes sensors to detect crosswind conditions while turning, comparing actual yaw rates and transverse accelerations with reference values to calculate partial braking and steering torques, enhancing stability by compensating for steering angle deviations through coordinated braking and steering controls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If crosswind detection is performed only when the vehicle is traveling straight, then false detection is reduced, but crosswind detection capability during turns is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrosswind detection accuracyVSAvoidcrosswind detection coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts crosswind detection based on vehicle operating conditions. It determines whether the vehicle is turning using steering angle sensors and only performs crosswind detection when the vehicle is traveling straight, adapting the detection algorithm to the current driving state to avoid false detections during turns while maintaining detection capability when appropriate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes detection parameters based on vehicle state. By monitoring steering angle and vehicle speed parameters, the system enables or disables crosswind detection functionality, switching between detection modes to balance accuracy and coverage based on real-time operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If only yaw rate comparison is used for crosswind detection, then detection simplicity is maintained, but false detection frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system complexityVSAvoidcrosswind detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The crosswind detection process is segmented into multiple independent evaluation stages. The system separately evaluates yaw rate data, transverse acceleration data, and vehicle state data, then integrates these segmented assessments to make a final crosswind detection determination, reducing false positives through multi-factor verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where detection results from multiple parameters (yaw rate, transverse acceleration) are continuously evaluated and cross-validated. The feedback loop compares actual sensor readings against expected values under normal conditions, adjusting detection thresholds based on accumulated data to reduce false detections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If only partial braking control is applied in response to crosswind, then system simplicity is maintained, but lane departure prevention effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidlane departure prevention effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges two control functions into a unified crosswind compensation system. It combines partial braking control (applying brake force to specific wheels) with steering control (adjusting steering angle) to generate a coordinated response that simultaneously counteracts the crosswind force and maintains lane position, achieving reliable lane departure prevention through integrated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If steering angle deviation is not compensated, then control system simplicity is maintained, but straight-line driving ability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidstraight-line driving ability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring steering angle deviations caused by crosswind compensation actions. It measures the actual steering angle using sensors, compares it against the desired straight-line trajectory, and applies corrective steering torque to eliminate the deviation, ensuring the vehicle maintains accurate straight-line driving capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies counteracting steering torque to compensate for steering angle deviations. When crosswind compensation through braking causes the vehicle to deviate from its intended path, the steering control system generates an opposing torque to counterbalance this deviation, restoring the vehicle to its correct trajectory

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Data Source

PatentUS12485877B2Apparatus and method for controlling vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 HL MANDO CORP
  • US12485877B2 patent drawing
  • US12485877B2 patent drawing
  • US12485877B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are an apparatus and method for controlling a vehicle. The apparatus for controlling a vehicle includes a sensor unit configured to output a signal corresponding to behavior information on a vehicle and a signal corresponding to information on an external environment of the vehicle, a controller configured to calculate a crosswind tendency including information on a strength and a direction of a crosswind applied to the vehicle based on the signal received from the sensor unit, calculate a partial braking torque for compensating for a pulling caused by the crosswind based on the crosswind tendency, and calculate a compensation steering torque for compensating for a steering angle deviation based on the partial braking torque, a braking unit configured to perform partial braking of the vehicle by outputting the partial braking torque, and a steering unit configured to perform steering of the vehicle by outputting the compensation steering torque.