Hybrid CT Attenuation Correction Using OSEM-B Reconstruction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for PET attenuation correction in hybrid CT imaging often result in poor transmission counts, misregistration, and inadequate correction for metallic artifacts and patient respiratory motion, leading to suboptimal image quality.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an ordered subset expectation maximization-bayesian algorithm for hybrid CT attenuation correction, which involves data acquisition, blurring to correct for motion, segmentation to remove artifacts, resolution matching, and reconstruction using the OSEM-B algorithm to enhance image accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional PET attenuation correction methods are used, then transmission data is acquired for correction, but poor transmission counts and insufficient correction quality result

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation correction accuracyVSAvoidtransmission counts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines CT transmission data with PET emission data into a unified attenuation correction framework. The CT-derived attenuation map is integrated with PET reconstruction, allowing the use of high-quality CT transmission data to compensate for insufficient PET transmission counts, thereby improving overall attenuation correction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate attenuation map derived from CT data that serves as a mediator between transmission data acquisition and final PET correction. This intermediate map bridges the gap by providing a high-quality attenuation reference that compensates for the limitations of direct PET transmission measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If transmission data is acquired for attenuation correction, then correction can be applied, but misregistration between transmission and emission data occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation correction accuracyVSAvoiddata misregistration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary registration and alignment of CT transmission data with PET emission data before attenuation correction is applied. By pre-aligning the datasets and establishing a consistent coordinate system, the method prevents misregistration artifacts from compromising the final correction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If standard reconstruction methods are used, then images are generated, but metallic implant artifacts and respiratory motion effects are not corrected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage generation speedVSAvoidmetallic artifacts and motion effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates the harmful effects of metallic implants and respiratory motion by identifying and segmenting these specific artifacts from the transmission data. By separating these problematic elements, the method can apply targeted corrections or mask these regions, preventing them from degrading the overall image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing strategies to different regions of the image based on local characteristics. Areas affected by metallic implants or respiratory motion receive specialized artifact correction, while other regions undergo standard attenuation correction, thereby optimizing overall image quality without uniformly complicating the entire reconstruction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If hybrid CT attenuation correction is implemented, then artifact and motion correction improve, but algorithm complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation correction accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the attenuation correction process into distinct modular steps: CT data acquisition, attenuation map generation, registration with PET data, artifact identification and correction, and final reconstruction. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall implementation by breaking down the complex algorithm into manageable, well-defined stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7378660B2Computer program, method, and system for hybrid CT attenuation correction
Publication Date: 2008.05.27 CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING TECH
  • US7378660B2 patent drawing
  • US7378660B2 patent drawing
  • US7378660B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention provide a computer program, method, and system to facilitate hybrid CT attenuation correction. In one embodiment, the method generally includes acquiring data from a scanner, utilizing an ordered subset expectation maximization-bayesian algorithm to reconstruct the acquired data, and forward projecting the reconstructed data. Such a configuration minimizes the computing resources required for reconstruction and improves attenuation correction accuracy.