Indoor Cycle Magnetic Resistance Assembly for Progressive Braking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing exercise equipment, such as indoor cycles, face issues with variable resistance systems that require frequent repairs and replacements due to wear and tear, leading to inconsistent resistance characteristics and inaccurate energy measurement, particularly with magnetic systems that provide abrupt resistance changes and wear down quickly.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic resistance system with a fixed and movable arm design allows for fine-tunable resistance adjustment by varying the position of magnets relative to the flywheel, using a non-ferrous disc for eddy current braking and incorporating strain gauges or load cells to accurately measure energy exerted by the user.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If friction brakes are used to vary resistance on the flywheel, then resistance can be adjusted, but the brake pad wears down over time causing inconsistent resistance characteristics and requiring repairs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance adjustmentVSAvoidresistance characteristic consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical friction brake system with a magnetic resistance system. Magnets are positioned on a movable arm that can be adjusted relative to the flywheel, creating magnetic resistance without physical contact. This eliminates brake pad wear while maintaining resistance adjustment capability, directly resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If magnets are positioned on a movable arm that lowers towards the flywheel to increase resistance, then resistance can be adjusted, but the resistance increases abruptly with very little adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance adjustmentVSAvoidresistance fine-tuning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the magnetic resistance system into multiple independent magnets arranged in a row on the movable arm. Each magnet can be independently positioned relative to the flywheel, allowing for fine-grained control of resistance. This segmentation enables precise, incremental resistance adjustments rather than abrupt changes, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If the same brake pad is used for both variable resistance and emergency braking, then the system is simpler, but the emergency brake effectiveness is reduced as the pad wears out

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake system structureVSAvoidemergency brake effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the emergency braking function from the variable resistance system by providing a separate emergency brake mechanism. This allows the magnetic resistance system to handle variable resistance without wear, while the dedicated emergency brake maintains its effectiveness independently. This resolution addresses both device complexity and reliability by separating the two functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If magnetic resistance systems are used to avoid wear, then repair frequency is reduced, but the cost and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance characteristic consistencyVSAvoidmagnetic system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies magnetic resistance only where needed - on a movable arm that interfaces with the flywheel - rather than converting the entire brake system to magnetic components. The movable arm with positioned magnets provides the necessary wear-free resistance while keeping the overall system structure relatively simple. This local application of magnetic technology resolves the contradiction between reliability improvement and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides progressive resistance adjustments with reduced wear, eliminating the need for frequent repairs and offering accurate energy measurement, enhancing user safety and exercise simulation consistency.

Implementation Method 1

a resistance system that uses magnets and a magnetic field to vary resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field interaction: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

using a non-ferrous disc for eddy current braking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current braking: Eddy Current Damping

Data Source

PatentEP3411124B1Adjustable resistance and/or braking system for exercise equipment
Publication Date: 2024.06.05 MAD DOGG ATHLETICS
  • EP3411124B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3411124B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3411124B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An adjustable resistance system for use with an indoor cycle comprising a magnetic resistance assembly, a friction brake assembly, and a resistance adjustment assembly.