Cyclonic Oil Separator with Tangential Outlet

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cyclonic oil separators in refrigeration systems face challenges with high pressure drop and limited space, leading to reduced separation efficiency and increased operating costs, as well as the risk of re-entrainment of collected particles.

Innovation Solution

A cyclonic oil separator design featuring a cylindrical casing with a tangentially oriented inlet and a cylindrical mouth that creates a vortex for efficient gas exit, reducing pressure drop and allowing for a smaller height while maintaining high separation efficiency, along with a frustoconical wall and closing plate to enhance particle collection and prevent re-entrainment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the cyclonic separator becomes narrower to remove smaller particles, then separation efficiency improves, but pressure drop increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The cyclone separator is divided into multiple sections with different diameters along its length. The upper section has a larger diameter for receiving the gas stream and creating the initial vortex, while the lower section narrows to enhance separation of smaller particles. This segmentation allows the system to maintain low pressure drop in the upper section while achieving high separation efficiency in the lower section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the cyclone separator have different geometric properties optimized for different functions. The inlet region is designed with specific angles and dimensions to minimize pressure loss during gas entry, while the separation region is narrowed to improve particle removal efficiency. This local optimization of geometry allows simultaneous achievement of low pressure drop and high separation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If the separator height is increased to improve separation efficiency, then separation performance improves, but available space is exceeded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidseparator height
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The cyclone separator transitions from a vertically-oriented long structure to a more compact design by utilizing radial and horizontal dimensions. The conical shape and strategically positioned outlets allow the gas stream to complete the separation process in a shorter vertical distance, effectively using three-dimensional space more efficiently to reduce the required height while maintaining separation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The cyclone separator employs curved surfaces including a conical lower section and rounded transitions between different diameter sections. These curved geometries guide the gas stream smoothly through the separation process, reducing turbulence and allowing efficient separation to be achieved in a more compact vertical space compared to straight-cylindrical designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Manufacturing precision

If filters are added to increase separation efficiency, then particle removal improves, but pressure loss increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the filter component from the separator system entirely, relying instead on the cyclonic action and geometric design to achieve particle separation. By extracting the filter element, the system eliminates the associated pressure losses and maintenance requirements while maintaining effective separation through the cyclone's centrifugal force and optimized geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Manufacturing precision

If the separator height is increased to improve separation efficiency, then separation performance improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidseparator structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The separator is segmented into distinct functional sections (inlet region, separation region, outlet region) with clear geometric transitions. This segmentation allows each section to be optimized for its specific function while keeping the overall design simple and manufacturable, avoiding the need for complex internal structures or multiple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves reduced pressure drop and enhanced oil separation efficiency, enabling effective use in spray and flooded evaporators without performance degradation, while minimizing the risk of particle re-entrainment and optimizing space usage.

Implementation Method 1

cyclonic separators are one of the most common types of separators used for the separation of oil from the refrigerant fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCyclone separation: Cyclone Separation

Implementation Method 2

the gas stream containing entrained particles enter the separator and bend around the inside of the body of the separator towards the bottom part of the separator. However, the entrained particles are not capable of changing direction as fast as the gas does, therefore, heavy particles (entrained particles like oil or water) hit immediately the inner wall of the separator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 3

The gas stream also travels downwards within the separator and at the bottom of the separator due to the vortex effect (created due to the very fast movement of the gas inside the separator) moves upwards towards a gas exit at the top

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex effect: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 4

the gas outlet is oriented tangentially to convey the discharged gas in a second horizontal axis transversal to the vertical axis and tangential to the cylindrical mouth. Such a solution allows to create a vortex near the gas outlet of the separator which helps channel the gas stream, free of the entrained particles, to exit the separator; therefore, pressure drop across the separator is reduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex: Vortex Ring

Data Source

PatentEP4431170A1Cyclonic oil separator
Publication Date: 2024.09.18 DAIKIN APPLIED EURO SPA
  • EP4431170A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4431170A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4431170A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A cyclonic oil separator (1) for separating entrained particles in a gas stream, comprises: a cylindrical casing (2); an inlet (3) for receiving the gas stream and to convey the stream tangentially to the inside of the casing (2); a cylindrical mouth (6), including a first part (6A) and a second part (6B) and extending vertically from the first part (6A), positioned inside a first end of the casing (2), to the second part (6B), projecting vertically from the casing (2); a gas outlet (4). The gas outlet (4) is connected to the second part (6B) of the cylindrical mouth (6) and is oriented tangentially to convey the discharged gas in a horizontal axis (H2) transversal to the vertical axis (V) and tangential to the cylindrical mouth (6).