Electric Delivery Vehicle Cabin Access and Blind-Spot Viewing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electrically-powered utility and delivery vehicles face limitations in design and functionality, particularly in terms of access, visibility, and safety features, which impact their effectiveness in delivery applications.

Innovation Solution

The design includes a frame structure with an operator cage, wheels, and a body featuring a movable rack system, integrated electric motors, advanced braking systems, impact management, and biometric door locks, along with a cap roof and canopy for enhanced access and visibility, addressing the limitations of conventional vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional door configurations are used in electric delivery vehicles, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but operator access and visibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator access and visibilityVSAvoiddoor configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle body is divided into multiple access points including first and second doors on opposite sidewalls, allowing operators to access the operator cabin from different sides. This segmentation provides flexibility for different delivery scenarios and improves ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An opera window is added to the second sidewall at a different longitudinal position than the second door, creating a multi-dimensional viewing arrangement. This allows the operator to see around corners and visualize areas not visible through traditional side mirrors alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of information

If traditional viewing systems are used, then device complexity is minimized, but visualization of rear and side areas is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewing area coverageVSAvoidviewing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The viewing system is segmented into multiple components: side mirrors mounted on the cap roof for general side viewing, and opera windows positioned at specific locations for corner and rear area visualization. Each component serves a specific viewing function, collectively providing comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The opera window acts as an intermediary viewing point that allows the operator to see areas that are not directly visible from the operator seat. It mediates the line of sight to include rearward and corner areas that would otherwise be blind spots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If conventional rack positioning is used, then device complexity is reduced, but delivery efficiency and operator convenience are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery efficiencyVSAvoidrack positioning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rack is made movable along tracks in the operator cabin, allowing it to be positioned dynamically between a stowed position (distant from operator seat) and a delivery position (close to operator seat). This dynamic positioning improves delivery efficiency by allowing operators to easily access items at different locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If basic safety features are implemented, then device complexity is minimized, but operator and cargo protection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator and cargo protectionVSAvoidsafety system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system is segmented into multiple independent components: operator cage for operator protection, impact management system for cargo and structural protection, and door locks with fingerprint recognition for security. Each component addresses a specific safety concern independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The impact management system is positioned forward of the operator cage and is designed to deform during impact events, absorbing collision forces before they reach the operator and cargo areas. This beforehand cushioning protects occupants and cargo from impact forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS12134341B2Land vehicles adapted for use as electric delivery vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.11.05 WORKHORSE GROUP INC
  • US12134341B2 patent drawing
  • US12134341B2 patent drawing
  • US12134341B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A land vehicle includes a frame structure, a plurality of wheels supported by the frame structure, and a body supported by the frame structure. The frame structure includes an operator cage that at least partially defines an operator cabin and a rear compartment positioned rearward of the operator cage in a longitudinal direction. The body includes a first sidewall arranged on one side of the vehicle and a second sidewall arranged on another side of the vehicle opposite the first sidewall.