Demountable Marine Propeller Hub Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional marine propellers with integrally cast blades and hubs are costly to manufacture, require complex machining, and suffer from performance issues due to non-uniform blade production and rigidity problems, necessitating entire propeller replacement upon damage.

Innovation Solution

A propeller design featuring a cylindrical hub split into two parts with axially extending housings and protrusions, allowing for easy assembly and disassembly with connecting members, enabling production of propellers with a higher surface area ratio and improved rigidity through a step-like form that ensures proper alignment and secure connection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If propellers are cast in one piece with integrally produced blades and hub, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing cost increases and blade surface area ratio decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The propeller is divided into two separate parts: the hub and the blades. The hub is produced separately and the blades are attached to it, eliminating the need for complex one-piece casting. This segmentation allows for simpler, more cost-effective manufacturing processes while maintaining structural integrity through proper connection design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hub and blades are merged through a connection structure that combines the advantages of separate production with the structural benefits of integration. The connection design ensures uniform blade positioning and maintains overall propeller strength while enabling independent manufacturing of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Strength

If propellers are cast in one piece with integrally produced blades and hub, then structural strength is improved, but machining complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmachining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the propeller into hub and blade components, the machining operations are divided into simpler, more manageable tasks. Each component can be machined independently with standard equipment, avoiding the need for complex setup and large machining tracks required for one-piece propellers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If blades are produced by casting, then production efficiency is improved, but blade uniformity decreases leading to balance problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidblade uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The hub is produced first with precisely positioned connection elements (such as recesses or mounting features) that serve as reference points. When blades are subsequently attached to the hub, these pre-positioned features ensure uniform spacing and orientation, eliminating balance problems while allowing efficient casting production of individual blades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Strength

If hub is made as single piece, then structural strength is improved, but adaptability for blade replacement decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidblade replacement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The propeller is segmented into a permanent hub and replaceable blade components. The hub maintains its structural strength as a solid component, while the connection interface is designed to allow easy removal and replacement of blades. This enables maintenance and repair operations without replacing the entire propeller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design allows damaged blades to be discarded and replaced with new or refurbished blades while retaining the hub. This extends the service life of the propeller system and reduces waste, as only the damaged components need replacement rather than the entire assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

5Power

If blades are provided all through hub thickness, then thrust performance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The propeller structure is segmented into hub and blade components, allowing blades to extend through the hub thickness for optimal thrust performance. The separate production of hub and blades eliminates the need for expensive one-piece casting while maintaining the through-blade configuration that maximizes propulsion efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2698314B1Demountable propeller
Publication Date: 2016.08.10 UELGEN MEHMET NEVRES
  • EP2698314B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2698314B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2698314B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Present invention relates to a marine vessel propeller comprising an even number of blades such as 4, 6, 8, which can be mounted or demounted to a hub made of two parts each having the half of the blades. The blades can be rigidly connected to each other by means of connecting members.