Hierarchical Depth Tracking Control Under Rudder Saturation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing underwater vehicles face challenges in achieving high-precision depth tracking due to strong coupling and nonlinearity in dynamics, complex underwater environments, inaccurate hydrodynamic parameter acquisition, and thruster output limits leading to control saturation and instability.

Innovation Solution

A three-layer hierarchical control system incorporating an adaptive line-of-sight guidance algorithm, nonlinear interference observer, and STSMC controller with adaptive saturation compensation to enhance depth tracking performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional control methods are used for underwater vehicle depth tracking, then the control system is simple, but the control precision deteriorates due to strong coupling and high nonlinearity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoiddepth tracking precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into three hierarchical layers: motion control layer (outer loop) for trajectory planning, dynamic control layer (middle loop) for attitude control, and actuator control layer (inner loop) for thruster control. This segmentation allows each layer to handle specific control tasks independently, improving depth tracking precision while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A nonlinear interference observer is introduced as an intermediary component to estimate and compensate for unknown disturbances and hydrodynamic parameter uncertainties. The observer acts as a mediator between the control commands and the actual system response, enhancing tracking precision without requiring complex model adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If adaptive line-of-sight guidance algorithm is adopted to estimate angle of attack in real time, then guidance accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance accuracyVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The adaptive line-of-sight guidance algorithm performs preliminary estimation of the angle of attack and generates expected pitch angle commands before the main control execution. This preliminary action allows the subsequent dynamic control layer to focus on attitude regulation, improving overall guidance accuracy while distributing computational complexity across different time scales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If STSMC controller with adaptive saturation compensation is adopted, then control stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidcontroller structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An adaptive saturation compensator is integrated into the STSMC controller to provide real-time feedback on control saturation status. The compensator monitors the actual thruster outputs and adjusts the control commands accordingly, preventing integral windup and maintaining control stability during saturation conditions. This feedback mechanism enhances stability without requiring fundamental changes to the controller architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller dynamically adjusts control parameters based on the saturation state of the actuators. When saturation is detected, the adaptive compensator modifies the control gains and command signals to maintain stability. This parameter adaptation allows the system to handle nonlinear actuator limitations while preserving the core STSMC control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If nonlinear interference observer is adopted to observe unknown interference, then observation accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference observation accuracyVSAvoidobservation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The nonlinear interference observer utilizes the system's own state measurements and control inputs to estimate unknown disturbances and hydrodynamic parameter uncertainties. By leveraging available sensor data and the known system dynamics, the observer achieves accurate interference estimation without requiring additional external sensors or complex measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12473061B2Adaptive STSMC hierarchical control method for depth tracking oriented to underwater vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 HUAZHONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH
  • US12473061B2 patent drawing
  • US12473061B2 patent drawing
  • US12473061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides an adaptive STSMC hierarchical control method for depth tracking of an underwater vehicle. The method includes: using an adaptive line-of-sight guidance algorithm to estimate the vehicle's angle of attack in real time and obtain an expected pitch angle; employing a nonlinear interference observer based on a sliding mode surface error to detect unknown interference; and applying an STSMC controller with adaptive saturation compensation to determine the expected control rudder angle from the sliding mode surface error, the expected pitch angle, and the observed interference. The adaptive saturation compensation corrects the rudder angle based on the saturation deviation, which is determined by the previously calculated expected control rudder angle and the actual output rudder angle at the previous moment. By introducing an adaptive saturation compensator in the dynamic control layer, the issue of rudder angle saturation is mitigated, thereby enhancing both control performance and stability.