Diagnostic Sample Drawer Mechanism for Contamination-Controlled Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional diagnostic testing methods face challenges such as sample contamination, human error, and operational inefficiencies, leading to inaccurate results and increased healthcare costs, particularly in high-volume testing scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A drawer apparatus for diagnostic devices incorporating a gear rack, constant force spring mechanism, rotary damper, latch solenoid, and drawer closed sensor, coordinated by an electronic control unit, ensures precise, secure, and contamination-free handling of diagnostic samples.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual processes are used for diagnostic testing, then operational flexibility is maintained, but human error and sample contamination risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest result accuracyVSAvoidmanual handling requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated sample handling, drawer operation, and containment verification without human intervention. The electronic control unit autonomously coordinates the drive mechanism, latch solenoid, and sensor monitoring to ensure reliable testing while eliminating manual contamination risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with an automated electronic control system that coordinates electromagnetic actuators (latch solenoid, drive mechanism) and electronic sensors to perform sample containment and handling functions, eliminating human error while maintaining operational precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If conventional handling methods are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but sample contamination and operational inefficiencies occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample containment integrityVSAvoiddrawer mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drawer mechanism is divided into distinct functional components: the drawer assembly with sample compartment, the drive mechanism with gear rack for controlled movement, the constant force spring for uniform retraction, the rotary damper for kinetic energy control, and the latch solenoid for secure locking. Each component performs a specific function that contributes to overall sample containment integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic control unit acts as an intermediary that coordinates all mechanical and electronic components. It receives sensor inputs, processes containment verification, and controls the actuation sequence of the drive mechanism and latch solenoid, ensuring reliable operation while managing the complexity of multiple integrated subsystems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If rapid testing is implemented to increase throughput, then productivity improves, but sample contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting throughputVSAvoidsample integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system verifies sample containment integrity before testing begins through sensor monitoring that detects drawer position and latch engagement. This preliminary verification ensures samples are properly sealed and contained before rapid processing commences, preventing contamination even during high-throughput operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The drawer closed sensor provides continuous feedback to the electronic control unit about drawer position and containment status. This feedback mechanism allows the system to monitor sample integrity throughout the rapid testing process, automatically detecting and preventing contamination events while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the reliability and efficiency of diagnostic procedures by minimizing contamination risks, reducing human interaction, and ensuring accurate test results through automated, controlled sample handling.

Implementation Method 1

The retraction force of the drawer may be uniformly modulated by a constant force spring mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A rotary damper may dampen kinetic energy during the drawer's opening and closing movements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous damping: Viscous Damping

Implementation Method 3

A latch solenoid may engage with the drawer to prevent unintended opening by maintaining the drawer in a secure closed state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetism: Electromagnet

Data Source

PatentUS20250231211A1Diagnostic sample drawer mechanism
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 CENTER POINT BIO-TECH LLC
  • US20250231211A1 patent drawing
  • US20250231211A1 patent drawing
  • US20250231211A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A drawer apparatus for diagnostic devices can include a body configured to form a sample receiving compartment for housing a diagnostic sample. The drawer apparatus can further include a gear rack directly affixed to the body and meshing with a drive mechanism. The drawer apparatus can further include a constant force spring mechanism coupled with the gear rack. The drawer apparatus can further include a rotary damper. The drawer apparatus can further include a latch solenoid. The drawer apparatus can further include a drawer closed sensor.