Differential Lock Protection Using Knock Sensors to Prevent Wear

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing differential protection systems in work machines often result in premature wear and damage due to improper engagement and disengagement of differential locks, especially in varying terrain and surface conditions, as they rely on preset timers that fail to detect slip accurately once locked.

Innovation Solution

A differential protection system utilizing knock sensors to convert vibrations into electrical signals, processed by a controller to assess the risk of wear, inhibiting locking during detected risk periods and commanding locking based on predefined conditions like steering angle and speed thresholds, thereby preventing hardware damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a preset timer is used to automatically disengage differential locks, then the system can operate automatically without continuous monitoring, but the differential locks may remain engaged during no-slip conditions causing both wheels to rotate at the same speed regardless of traction or turning angle, leading to premature wear and damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic differential lock controlVSAvoiddifferential lock engagement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors wheel speed differences and slip conditions in real-time, using sensor feedback to dynamically control differential lock engagement and disengagement, replacing the open-loop timer-based system with a closed-loop control system that adapts to changing terrain and operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The differential lock control system transitions from a static timer-based approach to a dynamic system that continuously adjusts lock engagement status based on real-time slip detection, wheel speed monitoring, and terrain condition assessment, allowing the system to respond adaptively to varying operational requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If the differential locks are engaged based on slip detection, then traction can be improved in slippery conditions, but once mechanically locked, slip is no longer detectable making it impossible to reliably disengage the locks to avoid premature wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction capabilityVSAvoidslip condition detectability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary disengagement of differential locks before turning maneuvers or when approaching conditions where slip detection would be lost, using predictive logic based on steering angle sensors, vehicle speed, and terrain analysis to proactively prevent wear conditions before they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary between the mechanical differential lock system and the operational conditions, using multiple sensors (wheel speed sensors, steering angle sensors, acceleration sensors) to mediate lock engagement decisions and ensure slip conditions remain detectable while maintaining traction when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Power

If the differential locks remain engaged during turning operations, then power distribution can be maintained, but turning the vehicle in non-slippery ground conditions with differentials locked causes damage even if the system functions as designed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower distribution to wheelsVSAvoiddifferential damage during turning
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by detecting turning conditions through steering angle sensors and vehicle dynamics data, then proactively disengaging differential locks before turning maneuvers commence or during the turning process, preventing the harmful ratcheting effect that would otherwise occur during directional changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively prevents differential wear by dynamically controlling the locking and unlocking of differentials, reducing damage and extending their lifespan by anticipating and responding to potential wear conditions more accurately than traditional timer-based systems.

Implementation Method 1

a knock sensor, configured to convert sensed vibrations into electric signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration to electrical signal conversion: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12179834B1Work machine with a differential protection system and method
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 DEERE & CO
  • US12179834B1 patent drawing
  • US12179834B1 patent drawing
  • US12179834B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A work machine with a differential protection system includes an electronic differential lock, a controller, and a knock sensor to convert sensed vibrations into electric signals. The controller is programmed to receive and process the electrical signals generated by the knock sensor, determine a risk of differential lock wear based on the processed signals. The program instructions include responding to the processed signals indicative of a risk of differential lock wear by inhibiting locking of the differential lock for a defined time period, and command locking the differential lock as a response to expiration of the defined period. The controller may further be programmed to command locking the differential lock as a response to a request to lock the differential lock and engagement conditions being met. The presence of a risk of differential wear is derived from a frequency and an amplitude of the processed signals.