Distributed Locomotive Control for Long Train Force Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current train control systems for heavy haul and freight trains face challenges in managing energy efficiency and in-train forces due to the complexity of long trains with distributed power, where precise speed control and force minimization are crucial for safe and efficient operation, but existing solutions do not fully address the multi-objective optimization and computational efficiency required.

Innovation Solution

A control system and method that calculates target speed and force profiles, adjusts locomotive control levels based on real-time operating parameters, and divides these controls between multiple locomotives to maintain optimal speed and force conditions, using an electronic control system to optimize train operation and minimize energy consumption and in-train forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If optimal train handling for heavy haul trains is achieved through multi-objective optimization of energy and in-train force minimisation, then energy efficiency and operational safety are improved, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The train is divided into multiple sections with distributed locomotives at different positions (head, mid, tail). Each locomotive is controlled independently based on its local conditions and the overall train state, allowing the complex control problem to be segmented into manageable subsystems while achieving global optimization of energy and in-train forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system calculates and stores optimal speed profiles and in-train force targets in advance based on route topography and train characteristics. This preliminary computation allows the complex multi-objective optimization to be performed offline, reducing real-time computational requirements while maintaining optimal energy efficiency and force management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the train length is increased to improve network capacity and energy efficiency, then transportation efficiency is improved, but the in-train forces and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidin-train forces
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The long train is segmented into multiple sections with distributed locomotives positioned at head, mid, and tail locations. This segmentation allows each locomotive to independently manage the forces in its local section, preventing excessive in-train forces from developing in any single location while maintaining the benefits of the long train configuration for network capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts locomotive control parameters including power output, braking force, and speed targets based on real-time measurements of actual in-train forces. By continuously monitoring and adjusting these parameters, the system maintains in-train forces within safe limits even as train length increases to improve network capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If distributed power with multiple locomotives in various positions is used to improve train handling of long trains, then operational flexibility and force distribution are improved, but the control coordination and synchronization difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrain handlingVSAvoidcontrol coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each locomotive is equipped with sensors that continuously measure local operating conditions including speed, acceleration, and in-train forces. This feedback is transmitted to the central control system, which coordinates the locomotives by adjusting their control parameters in real-time, enabling flexible train handling while managing control coordination complexity through continuous monitoring and adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control systems of multiple distributed locomotives are merged into a unified coordinated control architecture. The central control system synthesizes information from all locomotives and issues coordinated control commands, allowing the multiple locomotives to operate as an integrated system with improved handling characteristics while the merging of control functions manages the complexity of coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12091066B2Control system for operating long vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 INSYTE SOLUTIONS PTY LTD
  • US12091066B2 patent drawing
  • US12091066B2 patent drawing
  • US12091066B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a train comprising two or more locomotives, the method comprising the steps of:a) Setting one or more locomotive control levels and choosing a selected route of travel;b) Calculating a target train speed profile and a target in-train force profile over at least a portion of the selected route;c) Measuring one or more operating parameters related to the operation of the train;d) Calculating a future train speed profile and a future in-train force profile for a future period based on at least one of the one or more operating parameters, at least one of the one or more locomotive control levels and one or more pieces of information relating to the selected route;e) Calculating adjusted locomotive speed control levels relating to the one or more operating parameters based on a difference between the target train speed profile and the future train speed profile, the adjusted locomotive control levels being adapted to maintain the target train speed profile over the future period;f) Calculating adjusted in-train force control levels relating to the one or more operating parameters based on a difference between the target in-train force profile and the future in-train force profile, the adjusted in-train force control levels being adapted to maintain the target in-train force profile below a target level over the future period;g) Dividing the adjusted locomotive control levels and the adjusted in-train force control levels between the two or more locomotives to form locomotive-specific locomotive control levels for each of the two or more locomotives, the locomotive-specific locomotive control levels being at least partially adapted to control and/or balance in-train force levels below the target levelh) Provide locomotive-specific locomotive control levels for communication to each of the two or more locomotives; andi) Operating each of the two or more locomotives according to the locomotive-specific locomotive control levels.