Double-Leg Parallel Mechanism for Wider Rotation Without Singularities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional parallel mechanisms, such as Gough-Stewart platforms, have limited rotational range of motion due to kinematic singularities, which restricts their application in flight simulation and robotics, especially when handling large payloads, as they often require link arrangements that lead to bending or complex guiding tracks, limiting payload capacity and increasing costs.

Innovation Solution

A novel parallel mechanism with kinematically redundant actuation is introduced, featuring double legs composed of two conventional six-degree-of-freedom legs connected at their tips with a passive revolute joint and an additional link attached to the platform via a spherical joint, allowing for increased rotational range of motion while maintaining tension/compression loads, and a redundancy resolution algorithm to optimize force transmission and avoid singularities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional Gough-Stewart platform structures are used, then the mechanism can support large payloads through tension/compression loads, but the rotational range of motion is limited by kinematic singularities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload capacityVSAvoidrotational range of motion
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Each leg is segmented into two sub-legs connected by a passive revolute joint, allowing the leg to change its configuration and avoid singularities while maintaining load-bearing capability. The segmentation enables independent optimization of each sub-leg's orientation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The passive revolute joints introduce dynamic adaptability to the leg structure, allowing automatic adjustment of leg configuration in response to platform orientation changes. This dynamic reconfiguration enables the mechanism to operate beyond static singularity boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If links subjected to bending are used to increase rotational range of motion, then the rotational workspace is expanded, but the payload capacity is significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational range of motionVSAvoidpayload capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting each leg into two sub-legs with a passive revolute joint, the mechanism maintains straight link geometry (avoiding bending) while achieving enhanced rotational capability through configuration changes at the joint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism changes the orientation parameter of the passive revolute joints dynamically, allowing the legs to reconfigure and avoid singularities without altering the fundamental tension/compression load regime, thus preserving payload capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If hybrid architectures are used to increase rotational range of motion, then some rotational capability is improved, but the mechanism cannot support large payloads and still suffers from kinematic singularities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational range of motionVSAvoidpayload capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The parallel mechanism with redundant actuation serves multiple functions: it maintains the payload-bearing capability of conventional parallel mechanisms while simultaneously achieving enhanced rotational workspace, combining advantages previously available only in separate mechanism types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic reconfiguration capability through passive revolute joints allows the mechanism to adapt its geometry to avoid singularities while maintaining parallel kinematics, enabling both large payloads and extended rotational workspace.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If constant length struts mounted on linear or circular rails are used, then rotational range of motion is increased, but the forces induced in the rails are too large for large payloads and the rails are costly and difficult to build with precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational range of motionVSAvoidrail structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex rail guiding structures are extracted and replaced by simple passive revolute joints integrated into the leg structure. This eliminates the need for external rails while achieving similar or superior rotational capability with much simpler mechanics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The complex mechanical rail system is replaced by a simpler joint-based mechanism where passive revolute joints provide the necessary motion constraints without requiring external guiding infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11077547B2Parallel mechanism with kinematically redundant actuation
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 UNIVERSITE LAVAL
  • US11077547B2 patent drawing
  • US11077547B2 patent drawing
  • US11077547B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A parallel mechanism comprises legs with kinematically redundant actuation for a parallel mechanism. Each of these legs comprises a first sub-leg and a second sub-leg each with a proximal end and a distal end. A link has a proximal end and a distal end. A joint with a rotational degree of freedom (DOF) is between and common to the distal ends of the sub-legs, and the proximal end of the link. A joint provides two or more rotational DOFs at the distal end of the link and connects the distal end of the link to one end of the parallel mechanism. Joints in the sub-legs provide DOFs to the sub-legs and connect the proximal ends of the sub-legs to the other end of the parallel mechanism. A degree of actuation (DOA) is provided for each of the sub-legs to control movement of the link.