Double-Point Incremental Forming Path Planning for Geometric Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Double-point incremental forming techniques suffer from low geometric accuracy and a limited forming range, hindering their wide industrial application.

Innovation Solution

A method involving slicing and layering a three-dimensional model to generate 2D curve paths, determining primary and support paths for master and slave robots, and processing the part using a double-point incremental forming technique to improve precision and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If double-point incremental forming is used to achieve local incremental deformations, then flexibility and moldless manufacturing are improved, but geometric accuracy and forming range deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidgeometric accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the forming process into multiple discrete steps by slicing the 3D model into layered 2D curves. Each layer represents a discrete forming stage with specific tool paths, allowing incremental deformation to be controlled in segmented steps rather than continuous motion, thereby improving geometric accuracy while maintaining flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and planning the complete tool paths for both forming and support tools before actual manufacturing. The 3D model is sliced and processed to generate all necessary 2D curves and tool paths in advance, allowing optimization of the entire forming sequence beforehand to ensure high geometric accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If traditional incremental forming control methods are used, then process simplicity is maintained, but forming accuracy and control optimization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidforming accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by using the sliced 3D model to continuously guide and adjust tool paths during forming. The pre-calculated 2D curves serve as reference feedback for controlling tool positions and motions, ensuring that each incremental step follows the intended geometry accurately while maintaining systematic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary path planning and optimization before manufacturing by slicing the model and generating all tool paths in advance. This preliminary action allows comprehensive optimization of forming sequences, support strategies, and tool trajectories to maximize forming accuracy while keeping the actual manufacturing process straightforward

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If single-point incremental forming is used, then device complexity is reduced, but forming capability and accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidforming capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of forming and support operations into a coordinated dual-tool system. Both the forming tool and support tool operate simultaneously with synchronized tool paths derived from the same sliced 3D model, combining their capabilities to achieve high forming accuracy and capability while maintaining systematic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the precision of formed parts and reduces experimental costs by optimizing the control of forming processes.

Implementation Method 1

causing local plastic deformations of a metal sheet to make the metal sheet into a desired shell shape

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20250271835A1Double-point incremental forming manufacturing method and apparatus, and electronic device
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 HANKAISI INTELLIGENT TECH CO LTD GUIZHOU
  • US20250271835A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271835A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271835A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided in the present invention are a double-point incremental forming manufacturing method and apparatus, and an electronic device. The method comprises: acquiring a three-dimensional model of a part to be formed; slicing and layering the three-dimensional model to acquire a plurality of 2D curve paths, and respectively generating a master working path of a master robot according to each 2D curve path; and for each master working path, determining and generating a support path of a slave robot according to the master working path and the shape of the three-dimensional model; and processing and manufacturing said part according to the master working path and the support path and by applying a double-point incremental forming method. The present invention can effectively improve the precision of a formed part in a timely manner, and reduce the experiment cost.