Double Side Grinder Nanotopography Control via Warp Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current double side grinding processes for semiconductor wafers often result in nanotopography degradation due to misalignment of hydrostatic pad and grinding wheel clamping planes, leading to yield losses and inefficient quality control, as existing methods lack real-time feedback and require manual, time-consuming adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses warp measurement data to predict nanotopography and adjust grinding parameters in real-time, employing a fuzzy logic algorithm to optimize the operation of double side grinders and minimize misalignment, thereby improving wafer quality and reducing yield losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual realignment of clamping planes is performed, then nanotopography degradation is reduced, but production time increases significantly and consistency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanotopography qualityVSAvoidalignment adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback control by measuring warp data from ground wafers, analyzing the data to detect misalignment conditions, and automatically adjusting the clamping planes. This closed-loop feedback mechanism eliminates manual trial-and-error alignment while maintaining consistent nanotopography quality, directly resolving the contradiction between precision and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The grinder system performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment through automated warp measurement and data analysis. The system monitors its own performance, detects alignment deviations, and automatically corrects clamping plane positions without requiring operator intervention, thereby maintaining high precision while eliminating time-consuming manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If frequent manual alignment checks are performed, then nanotopography degradation is minimized, but productivity decreases due to repeated interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanotopography qualityVSAvoidwafer processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated measurement and adjustment system operates continuously during wafer processing without requiring production stoppages. Warp data is collected and analyzed in real-time, enabling continuous monitoring and adjustment of clamping planes, thus maintaining nanotopography quality while preserving uninterrupted wafer processing flow and high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical alignment operations with automated measurement and control mechanisms. Computer-based warp analysis and automated adjustment mechanisms substitute for operator-performed mechanical realignment, eliminating production interruptions while maintaining precision through continuous automated monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If automated feedback control is implemented, then real-time nanotopography optimization is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanotopography control accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple functions into a unified automated control platform that combines warp measurement, data analysis, and clamping plane adjustment. This multi-functional integration achieves real-time nanotopography optimization while managing complexity through consolidated system architecture rather than separate independent subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables immediate adjustments to improve nanotopography, reducing lag time and enhancing quality control, resulting in improved wafer yield and cost-effectiveness by providing real-time feedback and optimizing grinding parameters.

Implementation Method 1

The pads and wheels are oriented in opposed relation to hold the wafer therebetween in a vertical orientation. The hydrostatic pads beneficially produce a fluid barrier between the respective pad and wafer surface for holding the wafer without the rigid pads physically contacting the wafer during grinding.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrostatic pressure: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP2225070B1Nanotopography control and optimization using feedback from warp data
Publication Date: 2014.02.12 SUNEDISON INC
  • EP2225070B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2225070B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2225070B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Processing a wafer using a double side grinder (101) having a pair of grinding wheels (209). Warp data is obtained by a warp measurement device (103) for measuring warp of a wafer as ground by the double side grinder (101). The warp data is received and a nanotopography of the wafer is predicted based on the received warp data. A grinding parameter is determined based on the predicted nanotopography of the wafer. Operation of the double side grinder (101) is adjusted based on the determined grinding parameter.