DRAM Block Refresh Scheme for Row Hammer Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing DRAM memory protection methods against row hammering are inadequate as they rely on the physical isolation of memory point matrices, which may be too large for optimal management, especially when the hammering range exceeds matrix boundaries.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that includes activation counters for each memory block, triggering preventive refreshes of the block and adjacent blocks when activation counters exceed a threshold, and optionally incrementing adjacent block counters during activations to mitigate row hammering effects across larger ranges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If memory point matrices are used for isolation, then row hammering protection is provided within matrix boundaries, but the solution becomes inadequate when hammering range exceeds matrix size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverow hammering protectionVSAvoidprotection coverage range
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The memory device is segmented into multiple memory blocks, each with its own activation counter. This segmentation allows independent monitoring and refresh of each block, enabling protection to extend beyond single matrix boundaries while maintaining manageable isolation units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Adjacent memory blocks are merged into a shared refresh operation. When any block in a group reaches its activation threshold, all blocks in that group are refreshed together, providing coordinated protection across matrix boundaries without requiring separate refresh mechanisms for each block.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If activation counters are implemented for each memory block, then protection coverage extends beyond matrix boundaries, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection coverage rangeVSAvoidcounter and refresh management structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The refresh mechanism serves multiple functions: it refreshes the activated block individually when needed, and it can refresh multiple adjacent blocks simultaneously when hammering threats are detected. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized circuits for each protection scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Activation counters continuously monitor and count row activations in advance, triggering preventive refresh operations before actual row hammering damage occurs. This preliminary action prevents the need for more complex damage detection and repair mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If preventive refresh of adjacent blocks is performed, then row hammering protection is enhanced across block boundaries, but refresh overhead and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverow hammering protectionVSAvoidrefresh operation energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The refresh operation is applied locally only to affected memory blocks and their immediate neighbors, rather than refreshing the entire memory device. This localized approach provides adequate protection against row hammering while minimizing unnecessary energy consumption from refreshing unaffected blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Refresh operations are performed periodically based on activation counter thresholds rather than continuously. This periodic action allows the system to balance protection needs with energy consumption by refreshing only when activation patterns indicate potential row hammering threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12573444B2Memory device and method for protecting a memory device from the effect of row hammering
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12573444B2 patent drawing
  • US12573444B2 patent drawing
  • US12573444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for protecting a memory device (1) from the effect of row hammering. The memory device (1) comprises a DRAM unit (U) formed by a plurality of memory point matrices (MAT1-MATN) subdivided into a plurality of memory blocks (B1-BM). The memory device (1) comprises activation counters (CTR1-CTRM) respectively associated with the memory blocks (B1-BM). The method comprises the execution, with each activation of a row of a given block (Bi), of a step of incrementing the activation counter (CTRi) associated with the given block (Bi); and the initiation of the preventive refresh of all the rows of the given block (Bi) when the activation counter (CTRi) of this given block (Bi) exceeds a threshold value (Si). The protection method also comprises at least one of the operations aimed at: —including, in the preventive refresh, at least some of the rows of at least one block directly adjacent (Bi+1, Bi−1) to the given block (Bi); —incrementing, during the activation of the row or of certain rows of the given block (Bi), the activation counter (CTRi−1, CTRi+1) of at least one block directly adjacent (Bi−1, Bi+1) to the given block (Bi) and initiating the preventive refresh of all the rows of the adjacent block (Bi−1, Bi+1) when the activation counter (CTRi−1, CTRi+1) associated with this adjacent block (Bi−1, Bi+1) exceeds a threshold value (Si−1, Si+1).