Drilling Advisory System for Multi-Parameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drilling technologies face limitations in optimizing drilling performance by focusing solely on increasing Rate-of-Penetration (ROP) and are not adaptable to changing drilling conditions, often leading to equipment damage and inefficient operations due to reliance on single control variables and local search methods that can get trapped at suboptimal solutions.

Innovation Solution

A system that collects temporally evolving data from drilling operations, calculates data-relationship statistics to identify stable subintervals, and uses a combination of local and global search engines to optimize controllable parameters, such as Weight On Bit (WOB) and Rotation Per Minute (RPM), to improve drilling efficiency by making operational adjustments based on selected performance characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If single control variable optimization methods are used to increase ROP, then drilling speed is improved, but equipment reliability deteriorates due to bit failure and mechanical problems

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveROPVSAvoidequipment reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes from optimizing a single control variable to simultaneously optimizing multiple control variables (WOB, RPM, and other drilling parameters). This multi-parameter optimization approach allows the system to find parameter combinations that increase ROP while maintaining equipment reliability by avoiding extreme values that cause bit failure and mechanical problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic optimization that adapts to changing drilling conditions in real-time. Rather than using static single-variable optimization, the system continuously adjusts multiple parameters based on current drilling state, formation characteristics, and equipment performance, allowing it to maintain both high ROP and equipment reliability under varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If local search methods are used to optimize drilling parameters, then computational simplicity is maintained, but solution quality deteriorates due to getting trapped at suboptimal solutions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization method complexityVSAvoidoptimization solution quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges local search methods with global search methods into a hybrid optimization approach. The local search provides computational efficiency and convergence to nearby optima, while the global search component prevents trapping at suboptimal solutions by exploring the broader parameter space. This combination maintains reasonable computational complexity while significantly improving solution quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism that coordinates between local and global search processes. This intermediary manages the transition between exploration (global search) and exploitation (local search), allowing the system to escape local optima and find globally optimal or near-optimal drilling parameter combinations without excessive computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If fixed drilling parameters are used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but adaptability deteriorates when drilling conditions change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to changing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that monitor drilling conditions, performance metrics, and equipment status in real-time. This feedback information is fed back to the optimization engine, which automatically adjusts drilling parameters to maintain optimal performance as conditions change. This allows the system to remain simple to operate while being highly adaptive to changing drilling conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-service optimization where the drilling parameters are automatically adjusted by the optimization algorithm without requiring constant manual intervention. The system monitors its own performance and drilling conditions, then autonomously modifies parameters to maintain optimality, combining operational simplicity with high adaptability to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9482084B2Drilling advisory systems and methods to filter data
Publication Date: 2016.11.01 EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY(US)
  • US9482084B2 patent drawing
  • US9482084B2 patent drawing
  • US9482084B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Integrated methods and systems for optimizing drilling related operations include recording data, parsing the data into intervals and analyzing the intervals to determine if the performance data in each time interval is of sufficient quality for using the interval data in a performance optimization process. The quality assessment may involve evaluating the data against a set of determined standards or ranges. The performance optimization process may utilize data mapping and/or modeling to make performance optimization process recommendations.