Driver Attention Prediction for Adaptive Warning Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver assistance systems fail to account for the driver's attention direction when issuing warnings, potentially diverting attention away from the road during critical situations, as they do not detect whether the driver's eyes are focused on the display unit or the traffic.

Innovation Solution

A computing unit assesses the probability of the driver looking at the display unit during operating sequences using a pattern detection algorithm, considering input parameters like pedal gradients, steering angles, and pause durations to adjust warning signals accordingly, without requiring a camera system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the driver operates the central operating panel to access functions and information, then the ease of operation and functionality are improved, but the driver's attention is diverted from the road, compromising safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of the driver's viewing direction and operating sequence patterns before a danger situation occurs. By analyzing the operating sequence and predicting whether the driver will look at the display unit, the system prepares appropriate warning strategies in advance, ensuring that warnings can be issued promptly and appropriately when danger is detected, thus maintaining both ease of operation and safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the driver's operating actions and viewing direction, using this feedback to dynamically adjust the warning strategy. The computing unit analyzes the operating sequence in real-time and adjusts the warning intensity and timing based on the predicted viewing probability, creating a closed-loop control system that balances operational ease with safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If a warning system issues warnings regardless of driver attention direction, then the reliability of danger detection is improved, but the driver may be distracted further by unnecessary warnings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedanger detection reliabilityVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The warning strategy is made dynamic by continuously adjusting it based on the predicted viewing probability. The system adapts the warning intensity and timing according to the driver's current attention state, making the warning system flexible rather than static. This dynamic adjustment ensures that warnings are issued appropriately based on whether the driver is likely to be looking at the display or the road

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the warning strategy (intensity, timing, type) based on the predicted viewing probability. By varying these parameters according to the driver's attention direction, the system optimizes the effectiveness of warnings while minimizing unnecessary distractions, thus improving danger detection reliability without causing excessive driver distraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If a camera system with image processing is used to detect driver viewing direction, then the measurement precision of driver attention is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver viewing direction detection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by leveraging existing vehicle sensors (steering angle sensor, accelerator pedal sensor, brake pedal sensor) that indirectly indicate the driver's viewing direction. Instead of directly tracking the driver's eyes with complex camera systems, the computing unit infers attention direction from these intermediary measurements, significantly reducing system complexity while maintaining useful detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified model or copy of the driver's attention state by analyzing operating sequences and sensor data patterns. Rather than using complex direct observation methods, the system reconstructs the driver's viewing probability through pattern recognition algorithms that process readily available vehicle operation data, achieving acceptable measurement precision with minimal additional hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9099002B2Vehicle having a device for influencing the attentiveness of the driver and for determining the viewing direction of the driver
Publication Date: 2015.08.04 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US9099002B2 patent drawing
  • US9099002B2 patent drawing
  • US9099002B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle, in particular a motor vehicle, has a device for influencing the attention of the driver. The vehicle includes a display unit for displaying information content. The vehicle includes a central operating panel associated with the display unit. The vehicle includes a system for detecting a danger in traffic. The vehicle includes a system for issuing a warning regarding a detected danger, and the vehicle further includes a computing unit. The computing unit ascertains a viewing probability of the driver looking in the direction of the display unit during an operating sequence and at a viewing point in time. The computing unit takes the interaction of the driver with the vehicle into consideration for ascertaining the viewing probability. The warning is issued as a function of the ascertained viewing probability.