Driver Readiness Estimation via Bio-Signal and Behavior Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies inadequately address driver readiness during automated driving, particularly in switching from automated to manual mode, due to issues like driver fatigue and distraction, leading to increased risk of accidents.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that analyze bio-signals and driver behavior to estimate readiness by determining bodily sensory usage states, inferring task candidates, calculating driver intention, and assessing readiness for manual driving mode, using a Driver Readiness Estimator system that integrates sensors and bio-information analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automated driving mode is used to reduce driver workload, then driver fatigue and distraction are reduced, but driver readiness for manual mode switching deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver workloadVSAvoiddriver readiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring driver state (bio-signals, eye closure, head movement) and predicting future readiness levels before actual manual mode switching is required. This allows the system to prepare warnings or alerts in advance, ensuring the driver will be ready when manual intervention becomes necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously measuring driver physiological and behavioral parameters, comparing them against thresholds, and providing real-time feedback through warnings or alerts. This closed-loop feedback ensures the driver maintains appropriate readiness levels despite being in automated driving mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If driver monitoring is enhanced to improve readiness assessment, then driver readiness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver readiness assessmentVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into multiple independent modules: bio-signal sensors (EEG, ECG, GSR), visual monitoring (eye closure detection), behavioral monitoring (head movement, steering input), and prediction algorithms. Each module operates independently and contributes to the overall readiness assessment, making the complex system manageable and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses multi-functional sensors and algorithms that serve multiple purposes. For example, eye closure detection not only monitors fatigue but also indicates engagement level; bio-signal analysis provides both stress assessment and readiness prediction. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated sensors for each monitoring aspect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If multiple bio-signals and behavioral parameters are analyzed to accurately predict driver intention, then prediction accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver intention prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes multiple bio-signal and behavioral parameters simultaneously, using more data than strictly necessary for basic fatigue detection. By incorporating EEG, ECG, GSR, eye closure percentage, head movement, and steering input patterns, the system achieves superior prediction accuracy through comprehensive multi-parameter analysis, accepting the trade-off of increased processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediate processing layers including feature extraction modules that convert raw sensor data into meaningful indicators (e.g., transforming EEG signals into alertness scores, converting eye closure measurements into fatigue indices). These intermediaries simplify the relationship between raw multi-parameter data and final prediction outputs, making the overall system more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11027741B2Apparatus and method for estimating driver readiness and method and system for assisting driver
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST
  • US11027741B2 patent drawing
  • US11027741B2 patent drawing
  • US11027741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of estimating driver readiness in a vehicle for performing automated driving includes analyzing a bio-signal and a behavior of a driver through collected driver information, determining a bodily sensory usage state of the driver from the behavior of the driver, deriving chances of task candidates that are probable to occur from the driver during driving from the bodily sensory usage state of the driver to infer a task, determining an intention of the driver on the basis of the inferred chances of the task candidates, and calculating driver readiness using the intention of the driver.