Automated Driving Trajectory Adaptation for System-Limit Parking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver assistance systems face challenges in reliably and efficiently repeating driving maneuvers, particularly parking maneuvers, due to recorded trajectories exceeding system limits when automated, leading to potential termination or inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A device and method that adapt recorded driving trajectories to comply with vehicle system limits by adding additional driving moves and changes of direction, minimizing deviations, and optimizing the trajectory to ensure safe and efficient automated performance, using environmental data and cost functions to determine an adapted path that meets system constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If the recorded driving trajectory is used for automated performance, then the driving maneuver can be repeated automatically, but the trajectory may exceed system limits (steering angle, acceleration, speed) causing the system to terminate or fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated performance of driving maneuverVSAvoidsystem reliability during automated execution
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the recorded trajectory before automated execution to identify segments that exceed system limits. By detecting these exceedances in advance, the system can prepare appropriate adaptations (such as modifying steering angles or adding intermediate maneuvers) to ensure reliable automated execution without actual limit violations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the recorded trajectory by selectively modifying segments that exceed system limits while preserving segments that are within limits. This dynamic adjustment allows the trajectory to be customized for automated execution, transforming a static recorded path into a flexible, adaptively modified trajectory that complies with system constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If the recorded trajectory is modified to comply with system limits, then automated execution becomes possible, but deviations from the original recorded trajectory increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated execution capabilityVSAvoidtrajectory accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different quality levels of modification to different segments of the trajectory. Segments within system limits are preserved with high fidelity (minimal deviation), while only segments exceeding limits are modified. This localized approach ensures that the overall trajectory remains as close as possible to the original recorded path while achieving automated execution capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies specific parameters (steering angle, acceleration, speed) only where necessary to comply with system limits, rather than altering the entire trajectory. By changing parameters locally at exceedance points and maintaining original parameters elsewhere, the system minimizes overall deviation while enabling automated execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Extent of automation

If additional driving moves are added to the trajectory to comply with system limits, then the trajectory becomes executable automatically, but the execution time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated trajectory executionVSAvoidmaneuver execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the trajectory into portions within limits and portions exceeding limits. By identifying and isolating only the problematic segments, the system can apply minimal necessary modifications (such as adding intermediate steering adjustments) rather than restructuring the entire trajectory, thus reducing the increase in execution time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system efficiently handles limit exceedances by implementing minimal necessary adjustments rather than elaborate workarounds. For example, it may apply a single corrected steering angle adjustment to bypass a limit violation rather than adding multiple intermediate maneuvers, thereby rushing through the correction process and minimizing additional execution time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS20240239370A1Method and Device for Determining a Driving Trajectory for a Repeated Performance of a Driving Maneuver
Publication Date: 2024.07.18 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US20240239370A1 patent drawing
  • US20240239370A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for determining a driving trajectory for repeated performance of a vehicle maneuver is disclosed. The device is configured to determine that a driving trajectory recorded for the driving maneuver exceeds a system limit of the vehicle for the automated performance of the driving maneuver. The device is further configured to determine a driving trajectory for the driving maneuver which is adapted with regard to the recorded driving trajectory and does not exceed the system limit of the vehicle, and to provide and/or use the adapted driving trajectory for automated performance of the driving maneuver.