Dual Control Unit Emergency Halt for Automated Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In automated vehicles, there is a need for an extended emergency stop function and corresponding release and acknowledgment mechanisms, as existing systems lack passenger control and are vulnerable to malfunctions or manipulations, particularly in the absence of technical staff.

Innovation Solution

An emergency halt method that distinguishes between emergency stop and emergency halt signals, where the emergency halt is controlled by a separate control unit, allowing passengers to directly influence the vehicle's braking, and a dual-control unit system ensures secure operation and release through combined external and passenger acknowledgment signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single control unit is used for automated driving, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to vulnerability to malfunctions or manipulations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol unit structureVSAvoidcontrol unit reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into a first control unit for automated driving control and a second control unit for emergency halt control. This segmentation allows the emergency halt function to operate independently of the automated driving control, preventing single-point failures and enabling direct passenger intervention even when the automated driving system is malfunctioning or manipulated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If emergency stop is controlled by the automated driving system, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to lack of direct passenger control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency stop operationVSAvoidpassenger control reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The second control unit acts as an intermediary that receives emergency halt signals directly from the passenger and bypasses the automated driving control system. This intermediary control path ensures that passengers maintain direct control capability over the vehicle's braking system, independent of the automated driving system's state or responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If the first control unit remains active after emergency halt, then ease of operation is improved for resumption, but reliability deteriorates due to potential continued manipulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol resumptionVSAvoidcontrol security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Before allowing resumption of automated driving control, the system performs preliminary verification through a release signal from external infrastructure and acknowledgment from the passenger. This preliminary action ensures that the vehicle only resumes automated control when both the infrastructure and passenger confirm safety, preventing premature resumption that could expose passengers to continued manipulation or malfunction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11485329B2Emergency halt method and device for a vehicle driving at least partially in automated fashion
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11485329B2 patent drawing
  • US11485329B2 patent drawing
  • US11485329B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An emergency halt method for a vehicle driving at least partially in automated fashion. The method includes receiving an emergency halt signal; providing a blocking signal, a first control unit being blocked, and the control over controlling driving maneuvers of the vehicle being withdrawn from the first control unit; and providing a not-drive signal for starting an emergency halt maneuver of the vehicle.