Dual-Drive Dough Cutter Bar for Continuous Conveyor Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dough cutting devices using guillotines in continuous processes require complex mechanisms for the knife blade's movement, leading to high power consumption, maintenance needs, and limited flexibility in cutting operations.

Innovation Solution

A device with a cutter bar mounted on two independently controlled drives, allowing orthogonal movement relative to the conveyor, enabling simplified and flexible cutting or punching of dough with reduced power requirements and enhanced operational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a guillotine is designed to move downwards in the conveying direction at the same speed as the dough, then continuous cutting is enabled without stopping the conveyor, but the mechanism becomes complex requiring synchronization of two movements along two spatial directions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous cutting capabilityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting device is divided into separate functional components: a carriage that moves along the conveyor belt and a cutting blade that moves vertically. These segmented components can be controlled independently, eliminating the need for complex synchronization mechanisms while enabling continuous cutting operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting blade movement is separated from the conveyor direction by introducing a vertical dimension. The carriage moves horizontally along the conveyor while the blade moves vertically to perform cutting, transforming a single-direction coupled movement into two independent dimensional movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If a single drive is used to generate both horizontal carriage movement and vertical blade movement, then device complexity is reduced, but the drive becomes too powerful and cannot be precisely controlled for synchronized operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive system simplicityVSAvoidsynchronized control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The single drive system is segmented into two independent drives: one for horizontal carriage movement and one for vertical blade movement. This segmentation allows precise control of each movement independently, enabling accurate synchronization without requiring a single overly powerful drive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static single-drive configuration to a dynamic dual-drive configuration where each drive can be independently controlled and adjusted. This enables precise synchronization of the carriage and blade movements based on real-time operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Force

If the cutting blade is pre-tensioned to an upper position by springs and moved downwards by cylinders, then the cutting force is sufficient, but the mechanism becomes complex with multiple components and higher maintenance needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting forceVSAvoidmechanism component count
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-based tensioning mechanism is extracted and replaced with a direct drive system. The cutting blade is moved downwards directly by the vertical drive, eliminating the need for springs and associated tensioning components, thereby reducing mechanism complexity while maintaining sufficient cutting force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical spring-based tensioning system is replaced with a controlled mechanical drive system. Instead of using springs to provide cutting force, a controlled vertical movement mechanism is used, reducing the number of components and simplifying the overall mechanism while maintaining effective cutting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If the carriage horizontal movement is limited by the length of the first arm section, then the mechanism is simplified, but the cutting depth and flexibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism simplicityVSAvoidcutting depth flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The carriage is designed with dynamic movement capability, allowing it to travel the full length of the conveyor belt rather than being limited by a fixed arm section. This enables adjustable cutting depths and positions, providing flexibility for different cutting requirements while maintaining a relatively simple mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4442415B1Device for cutting or punching dough
Publication Date: 2026.02.18 RONDO BURGDORF
  • EP4442415B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4442415B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4442415B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The present application relates to a device for cutting dough, in particular a sheet of dough. The device comprises a conveying device on which dough can rest and with which it can be conveyed in a conveying direction, and a cutting device with a knife bar to which at least one knife blade is attached, in particular detachably. The device further comprises a displacement device with which the knife bar is linearly displaceable orthogonally relative to the conveying device in a first spatial direction, in particular the vertical spatial direction, in order to cut the dough lying on the conveying device at defined points. The displacement device comprises two laterally and oppositely positioned columns which extend in the first spatial direction relative to the conveying device and project from it, and on which the knife bar is mounted so as to be linearly displaceable in the first spatial direction.In a first embodiment of the device, a first drive is arranged on the first of the two columns and a second drive on the second column. The first drive and the second drive are controlled independently of each other by a control unit of the device to move the cutter bar linearly along the respective column in the first spatial direction. In a second embodiment of the device, the cutter bar is additionally linearly movable in a second spatial direction that is orthogonal to the first spatial direction. In a third embodiment of the device, the device has a counter-pressure plate on which the conveying device rests. The counter-pressure plate is resiliently mounted on a frame of the device by means of at least one spring element.