Dual Ejector Fuel Cell Flow Control for Retained Water Drainage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fuel cell systems with dual ejectors of different capacities face challenges in optimizing drainage from the fuel cell, particularly in managing retained water that affects power generation stability and electrode performance.

Innovation Solution

A fuel cell system with dual injectors and ejectors, where the first injector supplies fuel gas at a higher rate but for a shorter duration, and the second injector supplies at a lower rate but for a longer duration, controlled by an ECU to optimize drainage based on power requirements, ensuring efficient discharge of retained water.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single ejector with high circulation capacity is used, then fuel gas supply efficiency is improved, but drainage of retained water from the fuel cell deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel gas supply efficiencyVSAvoidretained water accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single ejector into two separate ejectors with different circulation capacities. The first ejector has higher circulation capacity for efficient fuel gas supply, while the second ejector has lower circulation capacity but provides sustained flow for effective water drainage. This segmentation allows each ejector to specialize in different functions, resolving the contradiction between supply efficiency and drainage performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different local qualities to the two ejectors by designing them with different circulation capacities. The first ejector is optimized for high-volume fuel gas supply with higher circulation capacity, while the second ejector is optimized for sustained drainage operations with lower circulation capacity. This local differentiation enables each component to perform its specific function optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Power

If the first injector supplies fuel gas at high rate for short duration, then power generation response is improved, but drainage velocity maintenance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower generation responseVSAvoiddrainage velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by controlling the injectors to operate in alternating cycles. The first injector operates at high rate for short duration to meet power demands, then the second injector operates to maintain drainage velocity. This periodic switching between injectors ensures both rapid power response and sustained drainage performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuity of useful action by coordinating the operation of two injectors so that while one injector is performing power generation supply, the other maintains drainage velocity. This continuous coordination prevents interruption in either function, maintaining both power response and drainage effectiveness throughout operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If dual ejectors with different circulation capacities are used, then drainage optimization is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretained water drainageVSAvoidejector configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing both ejectors to perform multiple functions. Each ejector can contribute to both fuel gas supply and water drainage depending on operational conditions. This multi-functionality reduces the need for completely separate systems for supply and drainage, thereby limiting the increase in system complexity while achieving drainage optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively enhances drainage of retained water, maintaining optimal drainage velocity and reducing power generation instability by ensuring continuous differential pressure and kinetic energy for efficient water removal.

Implementation Method 1

a first ejector provided between the first injector and the gas inlet portion to guide the fuel gas flowing out through the gas outlet portion to the first supply flow path through a first circulation flow path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVenturi effect: Venturi Effect

Data Source

PatentEP4693534A1Fuel cell system
Publication Date: 2026.02.11 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • EP4693534A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4693534A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4693534A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A fuel cell system includes a first supply part including a first injector and a first ejector and supplying fuel gas to a fuel cell through a first supply flow path connected to a gas inlet portion, a second supply part including a second injector and a second ejector and supplying the fuel gas to the fuel cell through a second supply flow path connected to the inlet portion, and a control unit controlling the first injector and the second injector. A circulation flow rate of the second ejector is larger than a circulation flow rate of the first ejector. The control unit controls the first injector and the second injector so that when either the first injector or the second injector injects the fuel gas at a predetermined cycle, the other of the first injector and the second injector injects the fuel gas during the predetermined cycle.