Dual Fin Integration for Electron and Hole Mobility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In integrated circuit manufacturing, existing technologies face challenges in enhancing both electron and hole mobility simultaneously, which is crucial for improving transistor performance and reducing leakage current, as advanced geometry planar FETs suffer from source and drain encroachment into the channel, leading to difficulty in turning transistors completely off.

Innovation Solution

A dual fin integration method is employed, where trapezoidal shaped fins are formed to enhance electron mobility and vertical shaped fins are formed to enhance hole mobility, with the trapezoidal fins having a larger base than the vertical fins, both integrated into a semiconductor device to optimize carrier mobility in FinFETs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If advanced geometry planar FETs are used, then device performance is improved, but source and drain encroachment into the channel occurs, making it difficult to turn transistors completely off

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor switching performanceVSAvoidleakage current
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the fin structure into two distinct types: vertical fins for hole mobility enhancement and trapezoidal fins for electron mobility enhancement. This segmentation allows each fin type to be optimized independently for its specific carrier type, resolving the contradiction by providing dedicated structures that prevent carrier leakage while maintaining high mobility for the intended carrier type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies local quality by creating different fin geometries in different locations within the semiconductor device. Vertical fins are strategically placed where hole mobility enhancement is needed, while trapezoidal fins are positioned where electron mobility enhancement is required. This localized optimization ensures that each region has the appropriate structure to prevent leakage while enhancing performance for its specific carrier type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If single fin structure is used, then manufacturing process is simple, but both electron and hole mobility cannot be enhanced simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefin fabrication complexityVSAvoidcarrier mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is segmented into separate etching steps for vertical fins and trapezoidal fins. The first etching process forms vertical fins using a first mandrel structure, while the second etching process forms trapezoidal fins using a second mandrel structure. This segmentation allows each fin type to be manufactured with optimized parameters while maintaining overall process feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds dimensional complexity by introducing two different fin geometries (vertical and trapezoidal) instead of a single fin type. This dimensional change in the fin structure allows simultaneous enhancement of both electron and hole mobility, trading increased manufacturing complexity for improved device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If higher mobility is achieved, then device performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier mobilityVSAvoidfin structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention reduces overall device complexity by applying local quality principles - each fin type is optimized locally for its specific carrier type rather than attempting to create a single complex structure that handles both carriers. This localized optimization simplifies the design space while achieving high mobility for both electrons and holes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The device is segmented into distinct regions with different fin types, allowing independent optimization of electron and hole transport paths. This segmentation prevents the need for a single overly complex structure and enables simpler, more effective fin designs for each carrier type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9728537B2Dual fin integration for electron and hole mobility enhancement
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 HFC SEMICON CORP
  • US9728537B2 patent drawing
  • US9728537B2 patent drawing
  • US9728537B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique for forming a semiconductor device is provided. Sacrificial mandrels are formed over a hardmask layer on a semiconductor layer. Spacers are formed on sidewalls of the sacrificial mandrels. The sacrificial mandrels are removed to leave the spacers. A masking process leaves exposed a first set of spacers with a second set protected. In response to the masking process, a first fin etch process forms a first set of fins in the semiconductor layer via first set of spacers. The first set of fins has a vertical sidewall profile. Another masking process leaves exposed the second set of spacers with the first set of spacers and the first set of fins protected. In response to the other masking process, a second fin etch process forms a second set of fins in semiconductor layer using the second set of spacers. The second set of fins has a trapezoidal sidewall profile.