Dual-Head Laser Machining with Rotating Support for Parallel Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current laser processing apparatuses face challenges in efficiently performing various processes such as partial peeling and removal of unnecessary portions due to limitations in flexibility and precision.

Innovation Solution

A laser processing apparatus with a rotatable support portion and multiple laser processing heads that allow for controlled movement and emission of laser lights to form modified regions simultaneously, enabling efficient peeling and processing by forming spiral or linear patterns with precise control over focusing points and rotation speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single laser processing head is used, then the device complexity is low, but the productivity is insufficient due to sequential processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidnumber of laser processing heads
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The laser processing system is segmented into multiple independent laser processing heads (first laser processing head and second laser processing head), each capable of independent operation. This segmentation allows parallel processing of different regions or aspects of the target, thereby increasing overall productivity without requiring each head to be overly complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple laser processing heads are designed with universal functionality to perform various laser processing operations (peeling, removal, modification) on different portions of the target. Each head can be independently controlled to perform different processes simultaneously, achieving multi-functionality at the system level while maintaining relatively simple individual head designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If multiple laser processing heads are used, then the productivity increases through parallel processing, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparallel processing capabilityVSAvoidcoordination control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control systems of multiple laser processing heads are merged into a single integrated controller that coordinates all heads simultaneously. This merging approach allows centralized management of multiple heads, reducing the overall coordination complexity compared to having separate control systems for each head, while still enabling parallel processing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the support portion is rotatable, then the adaptability for various processing patterns is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing pattern flexibilityVSAvoidrotation mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support portion is designed with dynamic rotational capability, allowing it to rotate during laser processing operations. This dynamic adjustment enables the system to adapt to various processing patterns (spiral, circular, linear) and access different portions of the target from multiple angles, significantly improving versatility while the rotation mechanism itself remains a relatively simple mechanical component

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If focusing points are precisely controlled, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocusing point position accuracyVSAvoidmovement control mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor the positions of focusing points generated by multiple laser processing heads. This feedback enables real-time adjustment and precise control of focusing point locations, achieving high manufacturing precision while the control complexity is managed through automated feedback loops rather than overly complex mechanical positioning systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances processing efficiency by allowing for simultaneous or parallel formation of modified regions, improving takt time and ensuring consistent pitches between processing spots, thereby reducing processing failures and achieving high-quality results.

Implementation Method 1

a first laser processing head configured to irradiate the target placed on the support portion with a first laser light to form a first modified region in the target; a second laser processing head configured to irradiate the target placed on the support portion with a second laser light to form a second modified region in the target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS20250091164A1Laser machining device
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS KK
  • US20250091164A1 patent drawing
  • US20250091164A1 patent drawing
  • US20250091164A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A laser processing apparatus includes a support portion, a first laser processing head, a second laser processing head, a first vertical movement mechanism, a second vertical movement mechanism, a first horizontal movement mechanism, a second horizontal movement mechanism, and a controller configured to control rotation of the support portion, emission of a first and a second laser lights from the first and the second laser processing heads, and movement of a first and a second focusing points.