Dual-Tail PAM Sampler Timing to Reduce Kickback Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) signal sampling in graphics processing units (GPUs) is prone to high kickback noise, which can cause signal distortion, timing errors, voltage spikes, and reduced system bit error rate (BER).

Innovation Solution

The use of dual-tail samplers with clock gating and asynchronous operation of multiple samplers reduces kickback noise. Specifically, dual-tail samplers include a first stage with an input pair, a cross-coupled load circuit, and a precharge device, along with pass-gate switches to control the sampling process. Additionally, the high, middle, and low dual-tail samplers operate at least partially asynchronously, with the high sampler operating on the rising edge of the clock and the middle and low samplers operating on the falling edge, or with clock gating based on the high sampler's output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple samplers operate simultaneously to sample PAM 4 signals, then sampling coverage is improved, but kickback noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling coverageVSAvoidkickback noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by dividing the sampling operation into distinct clock phases. The high sampler operates during the first clock phase while the middle and low samplers are disabled, then the high sampler is disabled during the second clock phase while the middle and low samplers operate. This periodic activation pattern ensures complete sampling coverage across both clock phases while preventing all samplers from operating simultaneously, thereby reducing kickback noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If samplers operate continuously to maintain sampling speed, then productivity is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by enabling samplers in alternating clock phases rather than continuously. The high sampler is enabled during the first clock phase and disabled during the second clock phase, while the middle and low samplers follow the opposite pattern. This periodic operation maintains continuous sampling capability across both phases while significantly reducing power consumption by keeping individual samplers inactive during their disabled phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by dynamically controlling the enable/disable state of different samplers based on the current clock phase. The system transitions between different operational configurations: during the first clock phase, the high sampler is active while middle and low are inactive; during the second clock phase, the high sampler becomes inactive while middle and low become active. This dynamic reconfiguration optimizes both power consumption and sampling continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250192763A1Devices and systems for sampling pulse amplitude modulation signals with reduced kickback noise
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US20250192763A1 patent drawing
  • US20250192763A1 patent drawing
  • US20250192763A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed device can include a dual-tail sampler. The dual-tail sampler can include a first stage with an input pair, a cross-coupled load circuit, a precharge device between drain nodes of the input pair, and at least one pass-gate switch between the input pair and the cross-coupled load circuit. Various other devices and systems are also disclosed.