Dynamic Air Traffic Separation via Real-Time Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current air traffic control systems rely on static separation criteria, which are not adaptable to dynamic changes in air traffic and user influences, leading to inefficiencies and safety risks due to their inability to account for real-time risk assessments and user-centric, multi-dimensional relationships.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic air traffic control system that uses a Defined Interval system-state for continuous, real-time risk analysis, integrating data from various sources, including air traffic control objects, weather, and flight crew qualifications, to determine optimal separation requirements based on measurable dynamics, allowing for flexible and efficient air traffic management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If static separation criteria are used in air traffic control, then safety standards are maintained through established rules, but the system cannot adapt to dynamic changes in air traffic and user influences, leading to inefficiencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety standardsVSAvoidadaptability to dynamic changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic separation criteria that continuously adjust based on real-time risk assessments. The system transitions from static, pre-defined separation standards to dynamic, continuously updated separation requirements that adapt to changing air traffic conditions, weather, and other operational factors. This allows the system to maintain safety while responding flexibly to dynamic changes in the air traffic environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the separation criteria parameters from fixed values to variable values that are continuously updated based on risk assessments. The separation requirements are no longer static numbers but dynamic parameters that adjust in real-time according to current operational conditions, including traffic density, weather conditions, and aircraft performance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If static separation criteria are applied, then implementation is straightforward with established rules, but the system lacks integrated, communicative relationships and cannot factor evolutions of technology and user influence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidintegrated relationships and technological evolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The risk assessment system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it evaluates separation requirements, integrates weather data, considers aircraft performance, assesses user influence, and provides a unified framework for dynamic separation criteria. This multi-functional approach replaces multiple separate systems with a single integrated risk assessment mechanism that handles various aspects of air traffic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where risk assessments are updated in real-time based on changing conditions. The separation criteria are continuously adjusted based on feedback from sensors, weather systems, and operational data, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to evolving technological capabilities and user influences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic, continuously updated risk analysis is implemented, then adaptive and responsive air traffic control is achieved, but system complexity increases with integration of multiple data sources and continuous updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive and responsive controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple data sources and assessment functions into a single integrated risk assessment system. Instead of maintaining separate systems for weather monitoring, traffic management, and separation criteria, the invention combines these into a unified risk assessment framework that processes all inputs and generates dynamic separation requirements in one integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-assessment and self-adjustment through automated risk evaluation. The risk assessment system continuously monitors conditions and automatically updates separation criteria without requiring manual intervention, allowing the complex system to manage itself through embedded algorithms and automated decision-making processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9082300B2Defined interval (DI) risk based air traffic control separation
Publication Date: 2015.07.14 DEFINED INTERVAL TECH INC
  • US9082300B2 patent drawing
  • US9082300B2 patent drawing
  • US9082300B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and process of an optimized, derivational risk-based air traffic control system state capitalizing on data exchange and interactive surveillance modalities with satellite functionality. Data interrogation will exchange operationally relevant real-time information amongst users and regulators, and a computer complex wherein data exchanges accumulate for application of risk model criterion and sovereign requirements. The risk model compares optimization of the system state with current state and communicated intent, making value judgments concerning safety and efficiency of the system as a whole and at intervals over time. Intuitive localization “swabs” reflecting collision potential, upset potential and other risks associated with any operation of air traffic control objects, manifest this. Localization solution set information is transmitted where necessary for implementation and may be proximity assurance tasks or operational requirements that must be performed within defined boundaries creating non-risk adverse associations.