Dynamic Clock Regulation via Duty Cycle Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Integrated circuits operating at high clock speeds face increased power consumption and heat generation, leading to reliability issues and higher costs due to the need for better packaging and heat sinks, as they cannot sustain continuous operation at design frequency over extended periods.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for dynamically controlling clock frequencies based on cumulative duty cycles, adjusting frequencies and load thresholds to balance performance and power consumption, including configuring a frequency control subsystem to manage clock frequencies according to current utilization and temperature monitoring, allowing for reduced frequencies when cumulative duty cycles exceed certain thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the clock frequency is increased to provide higher performance, then the processing speed and productivity are improved, but the power consumption and heat generation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic clock frequency regulation that adjusts the operating frequency based on cumulative duty cycle thresholds. The system transitions between different frequency states (first frequency value when cumulative DC is below threshold, second frequency value when above threshold) to optimize the balance between processing performance and power consumption, rather than operating at a fixed high frequency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by monitoring cumulative duty cycle and adjusting clock frequency accordingly. When cumulative DC exceeds the threshold, the system reduces frequency from the first value to the second value, effectively changing operational parameters to reduce power consumption while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the clock frequency is increased to provide higher performance, then the processing speed is improved, but the temperature increases leading to reliability issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidchip temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts clock frequency based on cumulative duty cycle to prevent excessive temperature buildup. By reducing frequency when cumulative DC exceeds thresholds, the system limits heat generation and maintains operational reliability without requiring more aggressive cooling solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary action by monitoring cumulative duty cycle and proactively reducing clock frequency before temperature reaches critical levels. This preventive approach avoids overheating and reliability issues by adjusting frequency in advance based on usage patterns rather than reacting to temperature extremes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Productivity

If the chip operates continuously at design frequency, then maximum performance is achieved, but the operational lifespan decreases due to reliability issues

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidoperational lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic duty cycle monitoring and frequency adjustment. By operating at high frequency intermittently (when cumulative DC is below threshold) and reducing frequency periodically (when cumulative DC exceeds threshold), the system extends operational lifespan while maintaining acceptable performance levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic frequency regulation based on cumulative duty cycle allows the system to adapt its operating characteristics over time, extending the operational lifespan by preventing continuous high-stress operation while maintaining performance during acceptable usage periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Temperature

If better packages and heat sinks are used to manage heat, then the temperature control is improved, but the device cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoiddevice cost
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses its own operational data (cumulative duty cycle) to self-regulate frequency and manage heat generation internally, eliminating the need for expensive external cooling infrastructure. The chip essentially manages its own thermal profile through intelligent frequency control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical/physical cooling solutions (heat sinks, improved packaging) with a software/control-based frequency regulation mechanism. By substituting thermal management hardware with intelligent frequency control, the system achieves temperature management without increasing device cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9563226B2Dynamic clock regulation based on duty cycle thresholds
Publication Date: 2017.02.07 MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD
  • US9563226B2 patent drawing
  • US9563226B2 patent drawing
  • US9563226B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A clock frequency is controlled by determining a cumulative duty cycle according to a ratio of a cumulative time, during an interval, that the clock frequency has a frequency greater than or equal to a design frequency threshold value to a duration of the interval. A frequency of the clock frequency is controlled to be a first frequency value when the cumulative duty cycle is less than a first duty cycle threshold; and controlled to be a second frequency value substantially less than the first frequency value when the cumulative duty cycle is greater than a second duty cycle threshold. The second duty cycle threshold is greater than or equal to the first duty cycle threshold.