Dynamic Contact Force Control in Machine Tool Finishing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Single-axis, force-controlled automated surface finishing tools struggle to maintain consistent contact pressure due to dynamic variables such as tool orientation, workpiece curvature, and abrasive media wear, leading to inconsistent material removal and surface finishing quality.

Innovation Solution

A control system that utilizes sensors to measure contact force and additional parameters like overturning moment, torque, and motor current to dynamically adjust the contact force, ensuring consistent pressure across the contact area, even as the tool orientation changes or abrasive media wears.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If single-axis force control is used to maintain constant contact force, then the control system is simple, but contact pressure varies due to tool orientation and surface curvature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidcontact pressure consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The control system measures additional parameters (overturning moment, torque, motor current) and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the contact force, closing the control loop to compensate for variations in contact pressure caused by tool orientation and surface curvature

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static force control to dynamic control by continuously adjusting the contact force based on real-time measurements of tool orientation, surface curvature, and abrasive wear, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If contact force is held constant, then control is simple, but contact pressure increases when contact area is reduced due to orientation or curvature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact force stabilityVSAvoidcontact pressure variation
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the contact force parameter dynamically based on measured conditions (orientation angle, surface curvature radius, abrasive wear) rather than maintaining a constant value, optimizing contact pressure across varying operational conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Duration of action of moving object

If abrasive media wears over time, then material removal continues, but more contact force is required to maintain the same material removal rate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabrasive media service lifeVSAvoidcontact force requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The control system monitors motor current and torque as indicators of abrasive wear and uses this feedback to automatically increase contact force when wear is detected, maintaining consistent material removal performance throughout the abrasive media's service life

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Manufacturing precision

If manual control is used, then dynamic factors can be compensated, but automation is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess control qualityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the machine tool to automatically compensate for dynamic factors and abrasive wear through sensor measurements and closed-loop control, eliminating the need for manual intervention while maintaining the quality of process control that a skilled worker would provide

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12097617B2Controlling contact force in a machine tool
Publication Date: 2024.09.24 ATI IND AUTOMATION INC
  • US12097617B2 patent drawing
  • US12097617B2 patent drawing
  • US12097617B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are provided for controlling the contact force in a single-axis, force-controlled tool responsive to dynamic process variables such as tool orientation relative to the workpiece, curvature of the workpiece wear of the abrasive media and other dynamic process variables that are not otherwise controlled by a single-axis, force-controlled actuator. A control system includes sensors for determining a contact force between the tool and the workpiece along a single-axis of compliance, and one or more additional process parameters, such as an overturning moment on the tool due to the orientation of the workpiece and surface curvature, torque about an axis of rotation of the tool, etc. The control circuit uses the measurement of these additional parameters are used to determine the control force between the tool and the workpiece.