Dynamic Object Detection Indicator for Automated Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated vehicles lack effective means to dynamically indicate the detection and tracking of external objects, such as pedestrians, to provide visual assurance of awareness and prevent potential collisions.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic object detection indicator system comprising a tracking system (computer vision, radar, and LIDAR) and a controller-circuit that processes detection signals to output command signals to an indicator device, which provides a dynamic visual indication viewable from outside the vehicle, adjusting orientation and intensity based on the object's position relative to the vehicle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated vehicles use tracking systems to detect objects, then object detection capability is improved, but lack of visual indication to external observers worsens safety communication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection capabilityVSAvoidvisual indication to external observers
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an indicator device as an intermediary component that mediates between the tracking system's internal detection and the external communication need. The indicator device receives detection signals from the tracking system and converts them into visual indicators that can be perceived by external observers, thus bridging the information gap without modifying the core detection functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the tracking system's detection results are fed back to the indicator device, which then provides visual feedback to external observers. This closed-loop feedback ensures that the external communication accurately reflects the internal detection state, allowing observers to understand the vehicle's awareness of surrounding objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If a dynamic visual indication system is added to indicate object detection, then safety communication is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety communicationVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The indicator device is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a detection status indicator and as a communication device. By making the indicator device universal in its function, the system avoids adding separate dedicated components for each function, thus improving safety communication while minimizing the increase in overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the indication function with the existing vehicle lighting or signaling systems where applicable, rather than adding completely separate components. This consolidation approach reduces the overall device complexity while still providing the necessary dynamic visual indication for safety communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of information

If the indicator device dynamically changes orientation to track objects, then visual assurance of awareness is improved, but processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual assurance of awarenessVSAvoidprocessing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The indicator device implements partial action by providing visual indication for only the most critical or relevant detected objects, rather than dynamically tracking all detected objects equally. This selective approach maintains visual assurance of awareness for important objects while reducing the processing burden compared to tracking every detected object with full dynamic indication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by providing enhanced dynamic indication for specific zones or regions of interest around the vehicle, rather than uniformly applying dynamic tracking indication in all directions. This allows the system to focus processing resources on critical areas where visual assurance is most needed, reducing overall processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11541806B2Dynamic object detection indicator system for an automated vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • US11541806B2 patent drawing
  • US11541806B2 patent drawing
  • US11541806B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a tracking system, a controller-circuit, and a device. The tracking system is configured to detect and track an object, and includes one or more of a computer vision system, a radar system, and a LIDAR system. The controller-circuit is disposed in a host vehicle, and is configured to receive detection signals from the tracking system, process the detection signals, determine, whether an object is detected based on the processed detecting signals, and in accordance with a determination that an object is detected, output command signals. The device is adapted to be mounted to the host vehicle, and is configured to receive the command signals and thereby provide a dynamic visual indication adapted to change in accordance with orientation changes between the host vehicle and the object. The dynamic visual indication is viewable from outside of the host vehicle.