Dynamic Range of Motion Orthosis with Segmented Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current physical therapy and resistance training techniques are limited in their ability to effectively rehabilitate muscular strength and range of motion in individuals with arm and shoulder paralysis, as they struggle to isolate weaker muscles from stronger ones and provide adequate anatomical positioning and prolonged stretching.

Innovation Solution

An orthotic device that provides adjustable forced motion in multiple degrees of freedom, including forearm supination/pronation, shoulder internal/external rotation, adduction/abduction, flexion/extension, and elbow motion, allowing for lockable positions and switching between locked and free states to focus exercise on weaker muscles while preventing stronger muscles from compensating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional resistance training equipment is used, then exercise can be performed, but stronger muscles compensate for weaker ones preventing effective rehabilitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverehabilitation effectivenessVSAvoidmuscle isolation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The orthotic device segments the arm into multiple controllable sections (shoulder, elbow, wrist, forearm) with independent adjustable components. Each segment can be locked at specific angles or allowed to move freely, enabling precise control over which muscles are activated during exercise. This segmentation allows weaker muscles to be targeted without compensation from stronger muscles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs dynamic locking mechanisms that can switch between locked and unlocked states for different degrees of freedom. This dynamic capability allows the orthosis to adapt during exercise, providing stability when needed and freedom of motion when required, thereby enabling effective muscle isolation and rehabilitation targeting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Duration of action of moving object

If the arm is placed in anatomical positions using traditional equipment, then stretching can be provided, but the arm may put more resistance than it is capable of moving

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestretch durationVSAvoidresistance force
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The orthotic device uses counterbalancing mechanisms and adjustable positioning to offset the weight and resistance of the arm itself. By providing mechanical support and counteracting gravitational forces, the device enables prolonged stretching in anatomical positions without requiring the paralyzed arm to generate excessive force, thus preventing injury while maintaining therapeutic benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Reliability

If an orthosis provides control over rotational degrees of freedom, then muscular rehabilitation is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverehabilitation effectivenessVSAvoidmechanical control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The orthotic device integrates multiple functions into a single system, combining support for various degrees of freedom (shoulder rotation, elbow flexion/extension, wrist movement, forearm pronation/supination) with locking, stretching, and exercise capabilities. This multi-functionality reduces the need for multiple separate devices while maintaining comprehensive rehabilitation control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs a nested structural design where components are arranged hierarchically (shoulder assembly containing upper arm components, which contain elbow components, etc.). This nesting allows complex multi-degree-of-freedom control to be achieved through a compact, organized structure that manages complexity through systematic arrangement rather than scattered mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS11622877B2Dynamic range of motion orthosis
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 DAVIES SEKLE BRANDON O
  • US11622877B2 patent drawing
  • US11622877B2 patent drawing
  • US11622877B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An orthosis provides a wearer at least one of forearm supination, forearm pronation, shoulder internal rotation, shoulder external rotation, shoulder adduction, shoulder abduction, shoulder flexion, shoulder extension, elbow flexion, and elbow extension. It includes a shoulder assembly adapted to be secured to a wearer's shoulder and an upper arm assembly connected to the shoulder assembly and adapted to be secured around a wearer's upper arm. The upper arm assembly defines an upper arm assembly axis. A wrist assembly is adapted to be secured around a wearer's wrist. The wrist assembly defines a wrist assembly axis. A splint arm assembly includes an upper splint arm, a lower splint arm, and a pivot pivotally connecting the upper splint arm to the lower splint arm. The upper splint arm adjustably connects to the upper arm assembly and the lower split, arm adjustably connects to the wrist assembly.