Dynamic Scheduling for Low-Latency SIMD Data Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processing systems for digital audio on parallel processors face challenges in reducing latency and efficiently scheduling repeated processing steps, particularly in real-time applications where missed samples or processing delays result in noticeable effects, and existing technologies do not effectively consider priority or execution deadlines when dynamically scheduling data samples.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a memory and processors configured to dynamically schedule data samples associated with chains or graphs of data processors, using a scheduling blueprint to manage tasks and resources, and a parallel distributed scheduler to assign tasks based on priority, execution deadlines, and resource availability, reducing latency by optimizing processing across multiple processors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional CPUs or DSPs are used for real-time digital audio processing, then processing can be performed sequentially with simple control logic, but processing speed and throughput are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the processing workload into discrete tasks organized in computation graphs, where each node represents a specific processing operation. This allows parallel execution across multiple processor cores while maintaining manageable control complexity through structured task decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic scheduling that adapts to varying processing requirements in real-time. The scheduler dynamically assigns tasks to available processor cores based on current system state, enabling flexible resource utilization without requiring complex static control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If GPUs with SIMT architecture are used to increase parallel processing throughput, then processing speed improves, but latency increases due to compute core design and hardware scheduler overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary configuration of computation graphs and task dependencies before execution. This pre-processing allows the runtime scheduler to efficiently dispatch tasks without excessive overhead, reducing latency while maintaining high throughput through parallel execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a software layer that acts as an intermediary between the host CPU and the parallel processing units. This software scheduler manages task queues and coordinates execution, abstracting away the complexity of direct hardware control while enabling fine-grained latency optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If dynamic scheduling based on priority and execution deadlines is implemented, then latency is reduced and real-time performance improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter space by representing tasks with explicit priority levels and execution deadline attributes. This parameterization enables the scheduler to make deterministic scheduling decisions based on simple comparison operations, reducing the complexity of real-time decision-making while achieving low latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If multiple processing chains or graphs are executed concurrently, then processing efficiency and resource utilization improve, but scheduling complexity and resource management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments multiple processing chains into independent computation graphs with well-defined interfaces and data dependencies. This segmentation allows the scheduler to manage each graph separately while coordinating resource allocation across graphs, reducing overall scheduling complexity through modular organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12026518B2Dynamic, low-latency, dependency-aware scheduling on SIMD-like devices for processing of recurring and non-recurring executions of time-series data
Publication Date: 2024.07.02 BRAINGINES SA
  • US12026518B2 patent drawing
  • US12026518B2 patent drawing
  • US12026518B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for parallel processing includes a memory and one or more processors, at least one of which operates a single instruction, multiple data (SIMD) model, and each of which are coupled to the memory. The processors are configured to process data samples associated with one or multiple chains or graphs of data processors, which chains or graphs describe processing steps to be executed repeatedly on data samples that are a subset of temporally ordered samples. The processors are additionally configured to dynamically schedule one or multiple sets of the samples associated with the one or multiple chains or graphs of data processors to reduce latency of processing of the data samples associated with a single chain or graph of data processors or different chains and graphs of data processors.