Dynamic Sensor Geometry via Formation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensor systems on craft have limited coverage and efficiency due to constraints in measuring technique, making it difficult to achieve desired sensor geometry and effective data collection, especially in dynamic environments.

Innovation Solution

A method for dynamic sensor geometry through formation control of sensor-carrying craft, allowing for adjustable sensor configurations and relative positioning to maintain desired sensor geometry and coverage, using a control system that acquires and compares state vectors to calculate and apply control power for optimal sensor arrangement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the speed of the sensor carriers is increased to cover a larger area per unit time, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to limitations in measuring technique

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearea coverage per unit timeVSAvoidquality of measured data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the measurement task across multiple sensor carriers (craft 11, 12a-d) that operate in coordinated formations. Each carrier covers a specific sector while maintaining precise relative positioning, enabling parallel data collection that increases overall productivity without compromising measurement precision through controlled segmentation of the survey area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor carriers operate with dynamic speed and position adjustments based on real-time formation control. The system continuously calculates desired state vectors and adjusts control power to maintain optimal sensor geometry while adapting to varying operational requirements, allowing speed optimization without sacrificing measurement quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the coverage of the sensors is increased to survey larger areas, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to the need for high sensor resolution which limits effective search area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvey area coverageVSAvoidsensor resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sensor carriers each equipped with high-resolution sensors survey different sectors simultaneously. The segmentation of the total survey area into multiple smaller zones allows each sensor to maintain high resolution while the collective system achieves comprehensive area coverage through coordinated operation of multiple units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single-carrier two-dimensional survey approach to a multi-carrier three-dimensional formation configuration. By adding the spatial dimension of multiple carriers operating at different positions and orientations, the system achieves both high resolution (through individual sensor performance) and large area coverage (through multi-carrier coordination)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If the number of sensors is increased to improve coverage, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need for arranging multiple sensors on craft with overlapping coverage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection efficiencyVSAvoidsensor arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding multiple sensors to a single craft, the system segments the sensor array across multiple independent craft. Each craft carries fewer sensors with non-overlapping coverage zones, simplifying individual craft sensor arrangements while achieving comprehensive coverage through the coordinated fleet. This segmentation eliminates the complexity of managing overlapping coverage zones on a single platform

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary that coordinates between multiple sensor carriers, managing their positions, speeds, and sensor orientations. This centralized mediation simplifies the overall system complexity by providing automated formation control and geometry maintenance, eliminating the need for manual coordination of multiple sensors across multiple craft

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9151858B2Method and system for sensor geometry
Publication Date: 2015.10.06 MARITIME ROBOTICS
  • US9151858B2 patent drawing
  • US9151858B2 patent drawing
  • US9151858B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and system for dynamical sensor geometry by means of formation control of sensor carrying craft, which operate below the water surface, on the ground, at the water surface and/or in the air, are manned and/or unmanned, and which are provided with one or more sensors. The sensors are arranged on the sensor carrying craft, and/or arranged with the sensor carrying craft in other suitable ways, such as towed behind the craft.