Dynamic Sensor Network Setup for Terrain-Adaptive Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensor network designs often fail to account for real-world terrain variations, leading to discrepancies between expected and actual detection zones, which can result in inadequate coverage and unintended gaps in the detection perimeter.

Innovation Solution

A method for dynamically reconfiguring sensor networks during setup to accommodate terrain variations, using a base unit and mobile deployment unit to adjust sensor placements in real-time, ensuring optimal overlap of detection zones and minimizing vulnerabilities in the detection perimeter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If sensors are placed according to theoretically expected detection zones, then the initial detection map appears adequate, but terrain variations cause significant alterations to actual detection zones resulting in inadequate coverage and gaps in detection perimeter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor placement precisionVSAvoiddetection perimeter reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection zone mapping by moving a sensor unit to multiple candidate locations and measuring actual detection zones before final sensor placement is determined. This preliminary action allows the system to identify terrain-induced variations and adjust sensor placements accordingly, ensuring reliable detection perimeter coverage despite terrain challenges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses measured detection zone data from preliminary sensor placements as feedback to iteratively adjust and optimize the sensor network configuration. By comparing expected versus actual detection zones and using this information to reposition sensors, the system achieves accurate detection perimeter establishment that accounts for real terrain conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If sensors are relocated to accommodate terrain features, then sensor placement becomes feasible, but the overlap of detection zones degrades resulting in failure to establish effective detection perimeter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor deployment easeVSAvoiddetection perimeter continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts sensor placements by repeatedly measuring detection zones at different locations and repositioning sensors to optimize detection perimeter coverage. This dynamic approach allows the sensor network to adapt to terrain constraints while maintaining detection zone overlap, ensuring both deployability and detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the spatial parameters of sensor placements based on measured detection zone characteristics. By adjusting sensor locations, orientations, and spacing based on actual detection performance data, the system maintains effective detection perimeter continuity even when sensors must be relocated due to terrain features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If traditional sensor network design methods are used, then initial setup is simple, but real-time adjustment capability is lacking preventing identification of coverage gaps during deployment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork setup complexityVSAvoidcoverage information availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-characterization by automatically measuring its own detection zones at each sensor location and using this information to guide subsequent sensor placements. This self-service capability eliminates the need for external surveying equipment or complex manual mapping, providing real-time coverage information while keeping the overall system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical surveying methods with sensor-based detection zone mapping. Instead of using external theodolites or total stations to map detection zones, the system uses the sensors themselves to measure and characterize their detection fields, providing real-time coverage information during deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8265870B1Real-time method for establishing a detection map for a network of sensors
Publication Date: 2012.09.11 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US8265870B1 patent drawing
  • US8265870B1 patent drawing
  • US8265870B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for establishing a detection map of a dynamically configurable sensor network. This method determines an appropriate set of locations for a plurality of sensor units of a sensor network and establishes a detection map for the network of sensors while the network is being set up; the detection map includes the effects of the local terrain and individual sensor performance. Sensor performance is characterized during the placement of the sensor units, which enables dynamic adjustment or reconfiguration of the placement of individual elements of the sensor network during network set-up to accommodate variations in local terrain and individual sensor performance. The reconfiguration of the network during initial set-up to accommodate deviations from idealized individual sensor detection zones improves the effectiveness of the sensor network in detecting activities at a detection perimeter and can provide the desired sensor coverage of an area while minimizing unintentional gaps in coverage.