Eddy Current Sensor Conductivity Determination via Frequency Locus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Eddy current examinations face challenges in accurately determining electrical conductivity due to the dependency on limited and non-gradated calibration samples, leading to complex interpolation methods with increased error, and the need for precise constant spacing during measurements.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using the product of circular frequency and electrical conductivity (ω*σ) to simplify the calibration process, where impedance values are calculated at different frequencies, allowing for the determination of electrical conductivity by varying the circular frequency, and using the ωσ locus to associate measurement values with material properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional calibration methods using limited calibration samples are used, then the calibration process can be performed, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to complex interpolation and increased error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivity determination precisionVSAvoidcalibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the calibration approach by varying the circular frequency ω as a continuous parameter instead of using discrete calibration samples. By measuring impedance at multiple frequencies and utilizing the relationship between frequency and conductivity (σ = ωσ/ω), the method creates a frequency-conductivity locus that eliminates the need for complex interpolation between limited calibration points, thereby improving measurement precision while reducing calibration complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces frequency as an additional dimension to the calibration process. Instead of relying solely on material property variations in calibration samples, the method adds the frequency dimension to create a two-dimensional calibration space (frequency-conductivity locus). This dimensional expansion provides more calibration data points and reduces interpolation errors, resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If constant spacing between the eddy current sensor and sample surface is maintained, then measurement reliability is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to strict spacing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidmeasurement operation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the measurement system insensitive to spacing variations through frequency variation. Instead of requiring static, constant spacing, the method dynamically adjusts the circular frequency to compensate for spacing changes. The frequency-conductivity locus allows determination of conductivity values across a range of spacings, transforming a static spacing requirement into a dynamic frequency-adjustment approach that maintains reliability while improving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If multiple calibration samples with exact and gradated material properties are used, then measurement precision is improved, but the ease of manufacture deteriorates due to difficulty in obtaining such samples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidcalibration sample availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual calibration model through the frequency-conductivity locus instead of relying on physical calibration samples. By measuring impedance at multiple frequencies with a single calibration sample (or even without physical calibration samples), the method generates a theoretical locus that copies the relationship between frequency and conductivity. This virtual calibration approach achieves high precision while eliminating the manufacturing difficulty of obtaining exact and gradated material samples

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise and simple determination of electrical conductivity with reduced measurement errors, allowing for accurate assessment across varying frequencies and material properties, while also accounting for spacing tolerances.

Implementation Method 1

If a sample or a calibration body formed from or by a suitable material enters into the alternating electric field, electric eddy currents are generated in the sample which in turn result in the formation of an alternating electromagnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

electric eddy currents are generated in the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentUS10429349B2Method for determining electrical conductivities in samples by means of an eddy current sensor
Publication Date: 2019.10.01 FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG EV
  • US10429349B2 patent drawing
  • US10429349B2 patent drawing
  • US10429349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In the method for determining the electrical conductivity in samples by an eddy current sensor, an alternating electrical field is excited at a known measurement frequency, an alternating electromagnetic field which is directed against the alternating electrical field is thereby formed, detected by a suitable detector, and the complex impedance is determined, which procedure is repeated at different known measurement frequencies, once in air and once with the same measurement frequencies at a calibration body, differences of the real and imaginary portions and of the measured values in air and over the calibration body are then divided by the respective measurement frequency, wherein a product ωσ is associated with each value pair ΔR/ω and ΔX/ω=ΔL in accordance with the associated measurement frequency w and the known conductivity a of the calibration body and a ωσ locus is presented in a Nyquist diagram.