EEPROM Memory Architecture for Embedded Applications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional EEPROM and Flash memory architectures face challenges in balancing word-erasability and high density, leading to longer read access times and higher electrical consumption due to parasitic capacitance and crosstalk issues, which are not optimally addressed in embedded memory applications that require both program and application data storage.

Innovation Solution

An electrically erasable and programmable memory architecture that includes rows of memory cells with interconnected control gate terminals for collective erasability and individually erasable words, using a Flash-like structure to reduce parasitic capacitance and crosstalk, with sense amplifiers connected through word selection transistors to adjacent bit lines, optimizing for embedded memory applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional EEPROM architecture is used, then word-erasability is achieved, but parasitic capacitance increases and read access time lengthens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveword-erasabilityVSAvoidread access time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The memory array is segmented into multiple blocks, where each block contains a subset of columns. Sense amplifiers are assigned to specific blocks, allowing parallel read operations across different blocks. This segmentation reduces the effective capacitance each sense amplifier must handle, thereby reducing read access time while preserving word-erasability through the floating-gate transistor architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a block dimension to the traditional row-column memory organization. By dividing columns into blocks and assigning sense amplifiers to specific blocks, the patent creates a three-dimensional addressing structure (row, block, column) that reduces parasitic capacitance effects during read operations while maintaining the word-erasable capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional EEPROM architecture is used, then word-erasability is achieved, but electrical consumption increases due to parasitic capacitance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveword-erasabilityVSAvoidelectrical consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The memory is divided into blocks with dedicated sense amplifiers, reducing the total capacitance that must be charged/discharged during read operations. This segmentation directly reduces electrical consumption while preserving the word-erasable function through the floating-gate transistor structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Quantity of substance

If Flash memory architecture is used, then high density is achieved, but page-erasability is limited and word-erasability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidword-erasability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the Flash memory single-transistor high-density cell structure with the EEPROM floating-gate transistor's word-erasable capability. By controlling the control gate voltage of the floating-gate transistor, the patent enables selective word-erasable operation while maintaining the high density of Flash memory architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic control of the floating-gate transistor's control gate to enable word-erasable operation. By dynamically adjusting the control gate voltage, the patent can selectively erase individual words or groups of words while maintaining the high-density Flash memory structure, making the erasability characteristic adjustable rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Area of stationary object

If sense amplifiers are connected through long multiplexing lines, then memory coverage is increased, but parasitic capacitance increases and read access time lengthens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory coverageVSAvoidread access time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the memory into blocks, each served by dedicated sense amplifiers located within or near the block. This eliminates the need for long multiplexing lines spanning the entire memory array, as sense amplifiers only need to connect to nearby bit lines within their assigned block, significantly reducing parasitic capacitance and read access time while maintaining full memory coverage through block-level parallelism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This architecture reduces parasitic capacitance, minimizes crosstalk, and enhances read access times while lowering electrical consumption, enabling efficient storage of both program and application data in embedded memory applications.

Implementation Method 1

a floating gate transistor having a control gate terminal to receive an erase voltage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical erasure:

Data Source

PatentUS8391079B2EEPROM memory architecture optimized for embedded memories
Publication Date: 2013.03.05 STMICROELECTRONICS (ROUSSET) SAS
  • US8391079B2 patent drawing
  • US8391079B2 patent drawing
  • US8391079B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to an electrically erasable and programmable memory comprising rows of memory cells to store words of N bits each, bit lines and word lines, wherein a row of memory cells comprises a first group of memory cells to store collectively erasable words, and at least one second group of memory cells to store one individually erasable word.