Electric Braking Device Adaptive Parking Lock Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric braking devices for vehicles face challenges in preventing control interference between service brakes and parking brakes, leading to increased size and weight due to the need for excessive strength in the braking system when the parking brake is engaged during strong braking operations.

Innovation Solution

An electric braking device with a single electric motor and a lock mechanism that prioritizes service brake control over parking brake control, where the lock mechanism operation is delayed until the actual pressing force becomes equal to or less than a preset upper value, ensuring the parking brake is engaged at a proper force range and reducing the overall size and weight of the device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the parking brake lock mechanism is immediately activated when the parking switch is switched on during strong braking operation, then the parking brake engagement is ensured, but the caliper must be designed with excessive strength leading to increased size and weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking brake engagement reliabilityVSAvoidbraking device weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the parking brake control adaptive rather than static. The control unit dynamically adjusts the timing of lock mechanism activation based on real-time detection of pressing force magnitude. When strong braking is detected (pressing force exceeds threshold), the system delays lock activation until braking force decreases, whereas under normal conditions the lock activates immediately. This dynamic response resolves the contradiction by ensuring reliable parking brake engagement only when appropriate, eliminating the need for excessive caliper strength design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from a simple binary switch signal to a multi-parameter control system that monitors pressing force magnitude and duration. By introducing pressing force threshold detection and timing-based control logic, the system transforms the parking brake activation from an immediate response to a conditionally delayed response. This parameter change enables the system to distinguish between normal parking brake requests and requests during strong braking, thereby avoiding excessive force application and reducing caliper strength requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the parking brake lock mechanism is immediately activated when the parking switch is switched on during strong braking operation, then the parking brake function is ensured, but the device size increases to secure sufficient strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking brake functionVSAvoidbraking device volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic control logic that adapts the parking brake activation timing based on real-time braking force conditions. The control unit continuously monitors the pressing force signal and adjusts the lock mechanism activation timing accordingly. During strong braking operations, the system detects elevated pressing forces and delays lock activation until the force subsides below a predetermined threshold, ensuring the parking brake engages only when appropriate. This dynamic approach maintains parking brake functionality while eliminating the need for oversized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the control parameter from a simple switch state to a composite parameter incorporating pressing force magnitude and time duration. By introducing force threshold detection and timing-based decision logic, the system changes how the parking brake response is determined. The control unit evaluates both the switch signal and the pressing force characteristics, activating the lock mechanism only when conditions indicate a genuine parking brake request rather than a concurrent strong braking operation. This parameter transformation enables compact design by preventing excessive force scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the parking brake is engaged during strong braking operation with excessive pressing force, then the parking brake maintains halted state, but control interference occurs between service brake and parking brake

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle halted state maintenanceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by having the control unit continuously monitor the pressing force signal generated during braking operations and use this information to regulate parking brake activation. The system feeds back the detected pressing force magnitude to the control logic, which then determines whether to activate the lock mechanism. This feedback mechanism prevents control interference by ensuring the parking brake engages only when pressing force is within appropriate ranges, eliminating the need for complex independent control systems while maintaining reliable halted state maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-service by automatically detecting braking force conditions and making intelligent decisions about parking brake activation without requiring additional complex control logic. The pressing force signal serves dual purposes: it controls service brake application and simultaneously provides the criterion for determining parking brake activation timing. This self-service approach simplifies the overall control system by using existing sensor data for multiple control functions, avoiding control interference while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration prioritizes the driver's braking operation even during strong braking, maintains the parking brake in a proper engagement state, and reduces the size and weight of the braking system by avoiding excessive strength requirements.

Implementation Method 1

an electric motor MTR configured to press a friction member MSB against a rotary member KTB

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a lock mechanism LOK configured to actuate a parking brake in the vehicle by locking rotation of the electric motor MTR

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical locking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 3

a pressing force acquiring means FBA configured to acquire a pressing force Fba by which the friction member MSB presses the rotary member KTB

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing: Force

Data Source

PatentUS10752229B2Electric braking device for vehicle
Publication Date: 2020.08.25 ADVICS CO LTD
  • US10752229B2 patent drawing
  • US10752229B2 patent drawing
  • US10752229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric braking device includes: an electric motor for pressing a friction member against a rotary member that rotates integrally with a vehicle wheel; a lock mechanism for locking rotation of the electric motor and applying a parking brake in accordance with operation on a parking switch; and a control for driving the electric motor and the lock mechanism. The control increases the electricity amount sent to the electric motor when a pressing force is less than a preset lower value at the time the parking switch is switched from off to on, starts actuating the lock mechanism when the pressing force equals or exceeds the lower value, and, when the pressing force is greater than a preset upper value greater than or equal to the lower value, starts actuating the lock mechanism when the pressing force equals or exceeds the upper value.