Electric Field Interaction for Propellant-Free Spacecraft Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing electromagnetic framework is incomplete in describing all forces from charges in relative motion, particularly in exploiting these forces for motion without propellant in spacecraft propulsion.

Innovation Solution

The use of complex electric fields and static electric fields from charges in different inertial reference frames, split into separate electric field equations, and coupled to derive forces on conductors or magnetic materials, allowing for propulsion without propellant using electricity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the traditional electromagnetic framework (Maxwell's equations treating magnetic field as independent) is used, then the mathematical framework is simple and well-established, but it is incomplete in describing all forces from charges in relative motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of force descriptionVSAvoidcomplexity of mathematical framework
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the magnetic field concept from the traditional electromagnetic framework and replaces it with a pure electric field formulation. By taking out the independent magnetic field and describing all forces through electric fields in different inertial frames, the patent achieves a more complete force description while maintaining mathematical tractability through Einstein's field transformation equations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the electromagnetic framework by eliminating the magnetic field vector and expressing all electromagnetic forces solely in terms of electric field vectors transformed between different inertial reference frames. This parameter change resolves the incompleteness of the traditional framework while providing a unified mathematical approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Force

If propellant-based propulsion systems are used, then thrust can be reliably produced, but the spacecraft carries additional mass and requires propellant storage systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust productionVSAvoidpropellant mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical propellant ejection system with an electromagnetic field-based propulsion system. Instead of mechanically expelling propellant mass to generate thrust, the system uses interacting electric fields from charges in different inertial frames to produce electromagnetic forces that propel the spacecraft, thereby eliminating the need for propellant storage and delivery systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The electromagnetic field system serves multiple functions: it generates thrust for propulsion, eliminates the need for separate propellant systems, and provides a unified framework for understanding all electromagnetic forces. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by achieving thrust production without the burden of propellant mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If electric fields from charges in the same inertial frame are used, then the mathematical treatment is straightforward using superposition, but the forces between conductors and magnetic materials cannot be fully described

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of force descriptionVSAvoidcomplexity of field interaction model
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic considerations by examining electric fields from charges in different inertial reference frames. By applying Einstein's field transformation equations, the patent accounts for the relative motion between charges and observers, enabling accurate description of forces between conductors and magnetic materials while maintaining a systematic mathematical approach that generalizes the static superposition principle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the production of forces to propel a spacecraft using electricity alone by interacting electric fields from charges in different inertial frames, providing a more comprehensive mathematical framework for forces between conductors and magnetic materials.

Implementation Method 1

complex electric fields and static electric fields from charges in different inertial reference frames

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric Field: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

forces from charges in relative motion that can be exploited to effect motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz Force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS10855210B2Complex electric fields and static electric fields to effect motion with conduction currents and magnetic materials
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 ELECTRO-SCALAR HLDG LLC
  • US10855210B2 patent drawing
  • US10855210B2 patent drawing
  • US10855210B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example, a method includes interacting electric fields from charges in conductors in different inertial reference frames to effect motion. The example method implements the mathematical framework that divides electric fields from charges in different inertial reference frames into separate electric field equations in electrically isolated conductors. The example method may implement the interaction of these electric fields to produce a force on an assembly that can, by way of illustration, propel a spacecraft using electricity without other propellant(s).