Electric Transmission Shift Control for Tooth-to-Tooth Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrically shiftable transmissions face challenges in controlling shift element movements effectively, leading to increased mechanical loads, delayed shift times, and reduced service life due to uncontrollable forces at critical positions like tooth-to-tooth engagement.

Innovation Solution

A method that segments the shift element movement into distinct portions, using position and force as controlled variables, and applies differentiated control modes with closed-loop control to optimize actuator operation, reducing mechanical loads and improving shift performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If pneumatic actuation is used to move the shift element, then the shifting process can be achieved, but the force acting on the shift element is barely controllable resulting in strong mechanical loads on transmission components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshifting processVSAvoidforce on shift element
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the pneumatic actuation system with an electric motor-driven actuator. This substitution allows for precise electronic control of the force applied to the shift element through closed-loop control, eliminating the uncontrollable high forces characteristic of pneumatic systems while maintaining the ability to achieve the shifting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements closed-loop control with feedback from a position sensor that detects the actual position of the shift element. The control unit continuously compares the actual position with the target position and adjusts the motor's force output accordingly, enabling precise force control throughout the shifting process and preventing excessive mechanical loads on transmission components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If a single control mode is used for the entire shifting process, then the control system is simple, but the shift time is increased due to inability to optimize for critical positions like tooth-to-tooth engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol systemVSAvoidshift time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the shifting process into multiple movement portions based on the detected position of the shift element. Different control modes are assigned to different movement portions: a first control mode is used for normal shifting, while a second control mode is activated for critical positions such as tooth-to-tooth engagement. This segmentation allows optimization of shift time at critical moments without requiring complete redesign of the entire control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic switching between different control modes based on the real-time position of the shift element. The control system adapts its behavior by selecting appropriate control modes for different phases of the shifting process, enabling faster response at critical positions while maintaining overall system simplicity through a unified control architecture that handles multiple modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If predetermined parameter sets are used for closed-loop control, then the control implementation is straightforward, but the parameter sets do not sufficiently represent the movement at critical positions resulting in delayed shifting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol implementationVSAvoidshifting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs different parameter sets for different control modes corresponding to different movement portions. The first parameter set is used for normal shifting operations, while a second parameter set is applied for critical positions like tooth-to-tooth engagement. This allows the system to optimize shifting speed at critical moments by changing parameters dynamically, while maintaining ease of implementation through pre-defined parameter sets for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Speed

If high forces are applied during shifting to overcome blocking positions, then the shift element can be moved, but the mechanical loads increase and service life of transmission elements is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshift element movementVSAvoidservice life of transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback from the position sensor to detect when the shift element approaches or is at a blocking position. The control unit then adjusts the motor's force output in real-time, applying sufficient force to overcome the blocking position while avoiding excessive forces that would damage transmission components. This feedback-controlled force modulation maintains reliability while achieving necessary movement speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary control actions by detecting approaching blocking positions before the shift element actually encounters them. The control system prepares appropriate force levels in advance, smoothing the transition through blocking positions and preventing sudden force spikes that would increase mechanical loads and reduce transmission service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS12571470B2Method for shifting an electrically shiftable transmission for a vehicle, and electrically shiftable transmission
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 ZF CV SYST GLOBAL GMBH
  • US12571470B2 patent drawing
  • US12571470B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method (100) for shifting an electrically shiftable transmission (230) for a vehicle (200a), in particular a utility vehicle (200b), includes detecting (105) a position (P) of a shift element (235) of the transmission (230). The method includes determining (110) a plurality of movement portions (301a, 301b, 301c) which relate to a shifting process (300), on the basis of the position (P), and determining (120) a control mode (254a, 256b, 256c) based on the movement portion (301a, 301b, 301c) corresponding to the current position (P). A control signal (255) is determined using the determined control mode (256a, 256b, 256c); and the control signal (255) is output for closed-loop control of the movement of the shift element (235).