Electric Wheel Vehicle with Passive Stability and Recuperative Braking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing self-balancing vehicles face issues such as lack of passive stability, inability to navigate curbs, potential for user trauma, and environmental concerns due to combustion engines, as well as high physical stress on users.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle design featuring an electric motor integrated into the wheel, a framework with ergonomic grips, and a braking system that includes an overrunning clutch and recuperative braking, allowing for stable and efficient movement on various terrains while minimizing user physical strain and environmental impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If automated stabilization system is used, then vehicle stability is improved, but device complexity increases and reliability decreases due to electronic failure risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex automated stabilization electronics from the vehicle design, extracting the instability problem to be solved through passive mechanical means instead. The vehicle achieves stability through its physical design—low center of gravity, wide wheelbase, and inherent mechanical balance—rather than relying on electronic sensors and motors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle is designed to be self-stabilizing through its mechanical structure, requiring no external electronic control systems. The inherent design features (low center of gravity, wheel configuration) enable the vehicle to maintain stability automatically without electronic intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Power

If combustion engine is used, then vehicle power is improved, but environmental harm increases due to exhaust emissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle powerVSAvoidexhaust emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the combustion engine with an electric motor, substituting a mechanical-thermal system with an electrical system. This eliminates exhaust emissions while maintaining vehicle power through electromagnetic motor operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If user stands on vehicle for balance control, then ease of operation is improved, but safety worsens due to trauma risk from falling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebalance controlVSAvoidtrauma risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle design incorporates a low center of gravity that acts as a counterweight mechanism, providing inherent stability that reduces the need for active user balance control. This passive stability reduces the physical effort required while maintaining safety by minimizing fall risk through improved balance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

4Device complexity

If electric motor is integrated in wheel, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidintegration precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the electric motor directly into the wheel assembly, merging two previously separate components into one integrated unit. This reduces the overall number of parts and simplifies the mechanical structure, though it requires precise manufacturing to ensure proper motor-wheel alignment and integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The vehicle provides enhanced stability, increased speed, and improved cross-country ability, with reduced physical stress on users and environmental impact, while enabling energy recuperation and safe operation on uneven surfaces.

Implementation Method 1

drive based on electric motor integrated in the wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

braking system featuring overrunning clutch

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10392057B2Vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 ORLOVSKIY NIKOLAY VLADIMIROVICH
  • US10392057B2 patent drawing
  • US10392057B2 patent drawing
  • US10392057B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle comprising a framework in form of beam, wheel, drive and braking system, while the vehicle is partially loaded with the weigh of user and the user stands on roller skates and holds the vehicle on the beam so that the wheel is behind the user and contacts with its tire the road surface; and when the user activates the drive, the wheel starts rotating and, as a result of friction between the wheel's tire and the road surface, there arises a force making the vehicle with user move. Additionally, another technique for operation of the same vehicle is being offered, at which the vehicle on the move is positioned in the front of user.