Electro-pneumatic Railway Brake Assembly with Dual Independent Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing railway vehicle braking systems face challenges in achieving precise and repeatable safety and emergency braking functions due to the complexity and material limitations of purely mechanical-pneumatic solutions, which are affected by temperature variations and require costly recalibration, leading to inaccuracies in stopping distances.

Innovation Solution

An electro-pneumatic assembly with two independent electronic processing and control units, coupled through enabling logic circuits, modulates solenoid valve control signals to maintain precise pneumatic pressure in accordance with predetermined safety levels, such as SIL 3 or 4, using microprocessor-based feedback control to overcome mechanical limitations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If purely mechanical-pneumatic solutions are used to execute emergency braking and safety braking functions, then safety levels (SIL 3-4) can be reached and verified, but the accuracy of functional characteristics deteriorates due to temperature variations and material limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety levelVSAvoidaccuracy of functional characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces purely mechanical-pneumatic solutions with an electro-pneumatic system that uses electronic control units and solenoid valves. This substitution allows digital control of braking pressure while maintaining the required safety levels, thereby improving measurement precision without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control through electronic control units that continuously monitor braking pressure and adjust solenoid valve actuation accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures accurate functional characteristics across temperature variations while maintaining SIL 3-4 safety levels through verified control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If purely mechanical-pneumatic solutions are used, then safety levels can be maintained, but device complexity increases due to required recalibration procedures and material specifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety levelVSAvoidcomplexity of mechanical-pneumatic components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical-pneumatic calibration mechanisms with electronic control units that use software-based pressure control. This reduces mechanical complexity while maintaining safety levels through digitally verified control logic and eliminates the need for physical recalibration procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If mechanical-pneumatic solutions with temperature-sensitive materials are used, then braking functions can be executed, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to temperature-induced variations in material properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking function executionVSAvoidrepeatability of functional characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces temperature-sensitive mechanical-pneumatic components with an electro-pneumatic system using solenoid valves and electronic control. This eliminates material property variations due to temperature, ensuring consistent manufacturing precision and repeatable braking performance across the operating temperature range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If electronic control units are introduced to improve precision, then measurement accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of braking pressure controlVSAvoidcomplexity of electronic control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the electronic control system into independent control units, each responsible for specific braking functions. This segmentation allows verification of individual control logic while maintaining overall system precision, and enables modular design that reduces complexity through clear functional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback control where electronic control units continuously monitor braking pressure and adjust solenoid valve actuation. This closed-loop approach improves measurement precision through real-time correction while managing complexity through standardized control algorithms and verification procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables precise and repeatable braking performance across varying temperatures, reducing the need for complex recalibration and improving the accuracy of stopping distances while maintaining safety integrity levels, thus enhancing the operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness of railway braking systems.

Implementation Method 1

solenoid supply valve (12) adapted to connect the chamber (11) selectively to a pressure source (PS) or to the atmosphere, and a vent or discharge valve (13) adapted to allow or selectively prevent the connection of the chamber (11) to the atmosphere

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid: Solenoid

Data Source

PatentUS10538229B2Electro-pneumatic assembly, particularly for a pneumatic braking installation for railway vehicles
Publication Date: 2020.01.21 FAIVELEY TRANSPORT ITAL SPA
  • US10538229B2 patent drawing
  • US10538229B2 patent drawing
  • US10538229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The assembly comprises a body wherein there are defined a chamber, a supply valve adapted to connect the chamber to a pressure source or to the atmosphere, and a vent valve adapted to allow or prevent the connection of the chamber to the atmosphere. The valves are provided with control solenoids to which respective electronic switches are coupled. The assembly also comprises electronic control devices adapted to provide, as a function of the values of at least one input signal, logic control signals to the electronic switches so as to control, through the valves, the value of the pressure in the chamber. The control means comprise two processing and control devices independent of one another, both receiving the input signal and designed to execute strategies for controlling the pressure in the chamber, equivalent to one another.