Electroactive Polymer Actuator Sliding Layers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electroactive polymer (EAP) bending actuators face challenges in increasing actuation force without compromising efficiency and energy delivery, as thicker actuators lead to increased internal stresses and reduced deflection distance, and laminating multiple EAP elements results in stress buildup and lower useful energy delivery.

Innovation Solution

A stack of electroactive polymer units with adjacent units in slidable frictional contact, allowing relative sliding to avoid stress buildup and enable efficient conversion of electrical to mechanical energy, with a mechanical coupling that fixes units in the stacking direction but allows sliding movement in the in-plane direction, using low-friction electrode materials and optional friction-reducing layers to facilitate sliding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the actuator is made thicker to increase actuation force, then the actuation force increases, but the internal stresses and stiffness increase resulting in reduced deflection distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation forceVSAvoiddeflection distance
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is divided into multiple discrete EAP layers stacked together, with each layer capable of independent deformation. This segmentation allows the stack to generate higher force through cumulative actuation of multiple layers while maintaining flexibility and deflection capability, as each thin layer can still deform effectively without the stress constraints of a single thick layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If multiple EAP elements are laminated in a stack to increase force, then the actuation force increases, but internal stress levels become larger reducing the actuator stroke

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation forceVSAvoidactuator stroke
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the constraint that normally bonds EAP layers together, removing the interlayer adhesion that causes stress buildup. By allowing the EAP layers to slide relative to each other through the low-friction intermediate layer, the system maintains the force multiplication benefit of stacking while eliminating the stress accumulation that would otherwise reduce actuator stroke and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A low-friction intermediate layer is introduced between adjacent EAP layers to act as a mediator. This intermediate layer enables relative sliding between EAP layers, reducing internal stress transmission while maintaining the stacked configuration for force amplification. The intermediate layer facilitates decoupling the force generation mechanism from the stress accumulation problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Force

If the actuator thickness is increased to deliver more force, then the force delivery increases, but the voltage requirement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce deliveryVSAvoidvoltage requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the actuator into multiple thin EAP layers, each layer can be actuated at lower voltage while contributing to the total force output. The cumulative force from multiple layers actuated at moderate voltage levels achieves the desired force delivery without requiring the high voltages that would be needed for a single thick actuator layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design increases actuation force without requiring higher driving voltage, reduces stress buildup, and enhances energy delivery efficiency by allowing sliding between units, resulting in improved mechanical performance and sensor functionality.

Implementation Method 1

Field-driven EAP's are actuated by an electric field through direct electromechanical coupling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromechanical coupling: Electroactive Polymer

Implementation Method 2

adjacent electroactive polymer units in the stack are slidable relatively to each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3278375B1Actuator or sensor device based on an electroactive polymer
Publication Date: 2019.05.15 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP3278375B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3278375B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP3278375B1 patent drawingFigure 5(a)~5(d)

AI summary

A bending actuator device or sensor device for sensing bending comprises a stack of electroactive polymer units. The adjacent electroactive polymer units in the stack are slidable relatively to each other. This means that, for an actuator for example, an increased actuation force is enabled without requiring increased driving voltage, and it also avoids the problems of stress build up by allowing sliding between the units.