Electromechanical Differential Lock Actuator with Resilient Coupling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing differential locking actuators are bulky, costly, and lack advanced sensing capabilities, leading to inadequate control and safety, particularly in tooth-on-tooth conditions, and they do not integrate well with vehicle onboard systems.

Innovation Solution

A compact electromechanical actuator using an electric motor and lead screw drive assembly with resilient coupling and multiple-state sensing, integrated with vehicle communication systems via a data bus, and featuring manual or automatic failsafe mechanisms for safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydraulic systems are used in prior art actuators, then the actuator can provide robust differential locking capability, but the physical size, vehicle cost, and weight significantly increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferential locking capabilityVSAvoidactuator weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the hydraulic system with an electromechanical system comprising an electric motor and lead screw drive assembly. This substitution eliminates hydraulic fluid, hoses, and pumps while achieving the same differential locking function through direct electromechanical actuation of the actuator pin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the hydraulic components from the actuator system, eliminating the source of weight and complexity while retaining the essential locking function through the simplified electromechanical drive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If prior art actuators are designed with basic two-state sensing, then the device complexity is reduced, but the control and safety capabilities are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensing capability complexityVSAvoidcontrol and safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multiple sensors that provide feedback about the actuator's position and the differential lock's engagement state. This feedback enables the control system to detect tooth-on-tooth conditions and adjust operation accordingly, improving safety and control while managing complexity through intelligent sensor integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If prior art actuators lack integration with vehicle onboard systems, then the actuator can operate independently with simpler control infrastructure, but additional separate conductor sets and control components are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol infrastructureVSAvoidintegration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the actuator's control system with the vehicle's existing onboard communication network (CAN bus or LIN bus). This integration eliminates the need for separate control wiring and components, allowing the actuator to communicate with other vehicle systems and be controlled through the vehicle's existing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides improved control and safety by preventing damage in tooth-on-tooth conditions and integrating seamlessly with vehicle systems, ensuring robust and efficient differential locking operations.

Implementation Method 1

an electric motor and lead screw drive assembly for driving an actuator pin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

lead screw drive assembly for driving an actuator pin configured to cooperate with the differential lock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 3

The actuator pin may be resiliently coupled to the lead screw to prevent excess force on the actuator pin under otherwise damaging conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10683921B2Differential lock actuation and control
Publication Date: 2020.06.16 THOMSON IND INC
  • US10683921B2 patent drawing
  • US10683921B2 patent drawing
  • US10683921B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An actuator for a differential lock includes an actuator pin that is resiliently coupled to a lead screw to prevent excess force on the actuator pin under otherwise damaging conditions, such as a tooth-on-tooth state of the differential. The actuator may include sensors for sensing the position of a lead screw nut and sensors for sensing the position of the actuating pin to provide improved control by sensing multiple states of the actuator, including a state in which a tooth-on-tooth condition is present in the differential.