Electron Beam Pulse Control for Precise Small Bore Drilling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing small holes in workpieces using electron beams face challenges in achieving precise control over the geometry and surface quality of the bore, particularly in thicker materials, and require longer processing times.

Innovation Solution

The method involves varying the energy input of the electron beam by adjusting parameters such as beam geometry, current, and path, using a vaporizable substrate to expel molten metal, and employing techniques from digital drawing to guide the beam for incremental movement, ensuring precise contour and cross-sectional control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of stationary object

If the electron beam irradiates the workpiece for a longer duration to deepen the bore, then the bore depth increases, but the processing time increases and thermal stresses accumulate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebore depthVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The electron beam operates in pulsed mode rather than continuously, with multiple pulses applied sequentially to progressively deepen the bore. Each pulse creates a bore section, and subsequent pulses extend the bore further while allowing thermal relaxation between pulses, thus achieving deep bores without proportionally increasing total processing time or thermal stress accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The beam current and pulse duration are varied between different pulses to optimize the drilling process. Higher currents may be used in earlier pulses to rapidly initiate bore formation, while later pulses use adjusted parameters to refine the bore geometry and remove molten material efficiently, reducing overall processing time while maintaining bore depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the electron beam intensity is increased to melt material faster, then the drilling speed increases, but the control precision over bore geometry deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling speedVSAvoidbore geometry control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By using pulsed electron beam operation with multiple pulses, the process achieves high drilling speed through cumulative material removal while maintaining geometry control. Each pulse contributes to bore deepening, and the periodic nature allows for consistent geometry formation with each pulse, preventing the geometry control deterioration that would occur with a single high-intensity continuous beam.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The beam current is dynamically adjusted between pulses and during pulses to optimize both drilling speed and geometry control. The system adapts beam parameters based on the drilling stage and material response, enabling fast material removal when needed while maintaining precise geometry control during critical phases of bore formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If a gas jet is used to expel molten metal from the bore, then the bore production efficiency increases, but the surface quality of the bore wall may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebore production efficiencyVSAvoidbore wall surface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The gas jet is activated periodically during or between electron beam pulses to expel molten metal from the bore. This periodic gas assistance removes material efficiently to maintain bore production speed, while the intermittent nature of gas application prevents continuous erosion of the bore wall surface, thus preserving surface quality while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Manufacturing precision

If the electron beam is moved incrementally along the workpiece path, then the bore geometry precision improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebore geometry precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The electron beam is positioned at discrete locations along the bore path corresponding to each pulse, rather than moving continuously. This periodic positioning at key locations achieves precise bore geometry through cumulative pulse effects while reducing the time required compared to continuous incremental movement, as the beam remains stationary during pulse application and only repositions between pulses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for rapid production of bores with controlled geometry, improved surface quality, and efficient removal of molten material, suitable for thicker materials, while minimizing thermal stresses and processing time.

Implementation Method 1

When an electron beam is directed at a workpiece, especially a metallic one, the electron beam introduces highly concentrated energy into the material, causing it to melt

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam heating: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

Some material may also vaporize, resulting in a depression with small transverse dimensions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam vaporization: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 3

The effectiveness of drilling can be increased by driving the molten metal out of the material using a gas generated by the electron beam from a substrate located behind the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas generation and expulsion:

Data Source

PatentEP3119551B2Method for producing small bores in work pieces by changing an operating parameter within a beam pulse
Publication Date: 2026.02.18 PROBEAM AG & CO KGAA
  • EP3119551B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3119551B2 patent drawingFigure 2a~2d
  • EP3119551B2 patent drawingFigure 3(1)a~3(1)d

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for producing in particular conical bore holes (48) in work pieces (22), wherein the contouring and cross-sectional form of the bore hole (48) can be influenced in that one or a plurality of operating parameters are changed, which parameters are selected from the following group: pulse length, beam diameter, beam current, acceleration voltage, beam focusing, deviation of the electron beam (12) from a beam axis, movement velocity of the electron beam (12) over the work piece (22).