Electron Beam Weld Heat Ring for Microstructure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electron beam welding faces challenges in controlling weld microstructure due to high cooling rates, which can lead to inferior joint strength and corrosion resistance, particularly when high traverse speeds are used, and existing heat treatment methods are costly and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A method of electron beam welding that splits the output into a pre/post heat ring and a fusion spot, where the fusion spot lies within the pre/post heat ring, allowing for controlled heat distribution and reduced cooling rates, eliminating the need for pre-heating and additional hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high traverse speeds are used in electron beam welding, then metal joining rate is improved, but weld microstructure quality deteriorates due to high cooling rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetal joining rateVSAvoidweld microstructure quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The electron beam is segmented into two distinct components: a preheat ring that applies distributed thermal energy to raise the base metal temperature and reduce cooling rates, and a focused fusion spot that provides concentrated energy for weld pool formation. This segmentation allows simultaneous achievement of high traverse speeds (high productivity) and controlled microstructure (high quality) by decoupling the heating functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the workpiece receive different heat treatment: the preheat ring applies gentle, distributed heating to the broader area to control thermal gradients and cooling rates, while the fusion spot applies intense, localized heating only at the weld pool location. This local differentiation enables high traverse speeds without compromising microstructure quality in the critical weld zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional heat treatment processes are applied to improve microstructure quality, then weld quality is improved, but equipment cost and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrostructure qualityVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electron beam welder is made multi-functional by configuring it to generate two beam patterns (preheat ring and fusion spot) from a single device. This eliminates the need for separate preheating equipment such as ovens, resistance blankets, or flame heaters, thereby improving microstructure quality without increasing equipment complexity or operational procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The preheat function and welding function are merged into a single electron beam process. The deflector coils and focusing mechanisms are used to shape the same electron beam into either a preheat ring pattern or a fusion spot pattern, combining what would traditionally require separate equipment into one integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Manufacturing precision

If a diffused electron beam is used for preheating, then microstructure quality is improved, but cathode wear increases and replacement frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrostructure qualityVSAvoidcathode lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The electron beam configuration is made dynamic through the use of deflector coils that can rapidly switch between focusing the beam into a tight spot for welding and shaping it into a broader ring pattern for preheating. This dynamic control allows the system to achieve preheat functionality without requiring a permanently diffused beam, thereby reducing cathode wear while maintaining microstructure quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method maintains high metal joining rates while improving microstructure control and weld quality, reducing costs and cathode wear, and ensuring consistent crystallization across the weld seam.

Implementation Method 1

splitting the output of an electron beam welder into two components, a pre/post heat ring and a fusion spot

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

applying the two outputs to a workpiece that is to be welded

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS20220402067A1Electron beam welding
Publication Date: 2022.12.22 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US20220402067A1 patent drawing
  • US20220402067A1 patent drawing
  • US20220402067A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of electron beam welding comprising splitting the output of an electron beam welder into two components, a pre/post heat ring and a fusion spot, applying the two outputs to a workpiece that is to be welded, traversing the two outputs along the desired weld path, and wherein the fusion spot lies within the pre/post heat ring and travels in tandem with and inside the pre/post heat ring. The pre/post heat ring may be annular. The fusion spot may be located at the centre of the pre/post heat ring. The output of the electron beam welder may comprise 1 to 100,000 discrete points. The beams may be deflected using the EB welder deflector coils. The time the electron beam spends on each discrete point may be identical.