Electron Beam and Remote Plasma Selective Etching Without Ion Damage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ion-based plasma etching introduces surface damage due to ion bombardment, compromising device performance, and requires separate steps for etching and deposition, increasing manufacturing cost and time.

Innovation Solution

Integration of an Electron Beam (EB) source and a Remote Plasma (RP) source enables simultaneous material-selective etching and growth without masking, using reactive neutrals from the RP to functionalize the surface while minimizing damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If conventional ion-based plasma etching is used, then etching capability is achieved, but surface damage is introduced due to ion bombardment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface damageVSAvoidetching capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful ion component from the plasma etching process while retaining the beneficial reactive neutral species. By using remote plasma sources, ions are eliminated and only reactive neutrals reach the surface, enabling etching without ion bombardment damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism where electron beam irradiation mediates the interaction between reactive neutrals and the surface. The electron beam activates the surface and facilitates etching by reactive neutrals without requiring direct ion bombardment, thus resolving the contradiction between etching capability and surface damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If separate steps for etching and deposition are used, then process control is simplified, but manufacturing cost and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess control simplicityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges etching and deposition functions into a single integrated process step. By using electron beam irradiation in the presence of reactive neutrals, the same process can simultaneously etch certain materials while depositing or functionalizing other materials, eliminating the need for separate etching and deposition steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal process that can perform multiple functions (etching, deposition, surface functionalization) depending on the material being processed. The electron beam-reactive neutral interaction can be tuned to achieve different outcomes on different materials, making the process multi-functional and reducing overall process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If material-selective etching and growth is achieved without masking, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but process selectivity control becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidselectivity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using focused electron beam irradiation to create spatially selective etching and growth. The electron beam can be precisely directed to specific locations on the substrate, enabling material-selective processing without physical masks. Different regions of the substrate receive different treatments based on electron beam positioning and material composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves infinite etching or growth selectivity, reduces surface damage, and simplifies semiconductor processing by integrating etching and growth into a single process, thereby lowering manufacturing costs and processing time.

Implementation Method 1

Electron Beam (EB) source... electron beam irradiation from the EB source... EB interacts with the modified surface and initiates material etching or growth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam irradiation: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

Remote Plasma (RP) source... activation of the precursor by dissociation and related processes... reactive neutrals can reach and functionalize the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma dissociation: Plasma

Data Source

PatentUS20250125124A1Electron beam-induced and remote plasma-assisted simultaneous material-selective etching and growth
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 UNIV OF MARYLAND
  • US20250125124A1 patent drawing
  • US20250125124A1 patent drawing
  • US20250125124A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of material-selective etching and growth includes providing an electron beam (EB) source and providing a remote plasma (RP) source. The EBsource and the RP source are applied simultaneously to a device comprising a first material of a first selected area and a second material of a second selected area, wherein the simultaneous application of electron beam irradiation from the EB source and the chemical fluxes from the RP source performs etching of the first material and growth of a third material on the second material by chemical conversion.