Electropneumatic Brake Circuit Redundancy for Autonomous Steering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electric braking and steering systems in vehicles lack sufficient fail safety and redundancy, especially in autonomous driving scenarios, where faults in electronic controllers or energy supplies can lead to loss of steering and braking control, compromising safety and compatibility with series production due to high costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

An electropneumatic service brake device with an electronic brake control system that generates pneumatic brake pressures independently of driver input, using dual energy supply circuits and sensors to ensure continuous operation of steering and braking functions even in fault conditions, allowing for automated control without driver intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If redundant electronic system components and energy supply are implemented to improve fail safety, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefail safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into two independent brake circuits (first and second brake circuits) with separate electronic control devices and energy supply circuits. This segmentation allows one circuit to fail while the other continues to operate, providing redundancy without requiring a completely duplicated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second brake circuit is designed to serve dual purposes: it functions as a normal braking circuit during operation and as a steering substitute circuit when the first brake circuit fails. This multi-functionality provides redundancy without requiring dedicated separate systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If completely redundant electronic system components are implemented to improve fail safety, then reliability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefail safetyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The second brake circuit and its associated electronic control device are designed to perform multiple functions: normal braking operation and steering substitution. This eliminates the need for completely separate redundant systems, reducing component costs while maintaining fail safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The electronic control device dynamically changes its operating parameters and control strategies based on the operational state of the brake circuits. When the first circuit fails, the control device switches to alternative control algorithms that utilize the second circuit for both braking and steering functions, maintaining performance without requiring additional hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Extent of automation

If steering and braking functions are completely automated for autonomous driving, then extent of automation is improved, but reliability decreases due to potential faults in electronic controllers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated controlVSAvoidcontrol safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a backup brake circuit and alternative control strategies that are prepared in advance to take over in case of electronic controller faults. This prior cushioning ensures that automated control can continue even when electronic systems fail, maintaining reliability during autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The second brake circuit acts as an intermediary backup system that can mediate between the failure of electronic controllers and the need for continued automated steering and braking control. When primary electronic control fails, the second circuit provides an alternative pathway for maintaining automated vehicle control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If selective braking of individual wheels is used to maintain steerability after steering component failure, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteerability maintenanceVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The second brake circuit is designed to universally handle both braking and steering substitution functions. By using the existing brake infrastructure for dual purposes, the system maintains steerability after steering component failure without requiring complex additional steering mechanisms or control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical steering function with a braking-based steering substitution mechanism. By selectively applying brake force to individual wheels through the second brake circuit, the system generates yaw moments that substitute for failed mechanical steering, maintaining vehicle steerability through a different physical principle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances fail safety by enabling continuous steering and braking control in autonomous driving scenarios, reducing costs and complexity, and ensuring maximum braking power through redundant systems, while allowing driver override when necessary.

Implementation Method 1

The solenoid valve device (52) has an output connection (50) which is connected to the first control chamber (22)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid: Solenoid

Data Source

PatentUS10137875B2Electric equipment of a vehicle, comprising an at least partly electric braking and steering device with high availability
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 KNORR BREMSE SYSTEME FUER NUTZFAHIZEUGE GMBH
  • US10137875B2 patent drawing
  • US10137875B2 patent drawing
  • US10137875B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A braking system and a method of operating such a braking system are provided for a vehicle having at least partly electric braking, a steering device containing an electric or electromechanical steering device, an electronic steering controller and an electric steering adjuster and containing a service brake device. The system includes an electropneumatic service brake device containing an electropneumatic service brake valve device, an electronic brake controller, electropneumatic modulators, pneumatic wheel brake actuators, a service brake actuating element, and at least one electric channel (130) with at least one electric brake value transmitter which senses activation of the service brake actuating element. The at least one electric brake value transmitter produces actuation signals which are relayed to the electronic brake controller. The electronic brake controller causes a first actuation force to be applied to at least one control piston of the service brake valve device to control at least one double seat valve of the service brake valve device to generate pneumatic braking pressures or brake control pressures for the pneumatic wheel brake actuators. The electronic controls are further configured to generate a second actuation force on the at least one control piston when a brake request independent of the driver's request exists, independent of a driver brake request. The electropneumatic service brake device is supplied with energy independently from energy supplied to the electropneumatic service brake valve device and the electric or electromechanical steering device.