Electropneumatic Parking Brake Valve Unit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electropneumatic parking brake modules are complex and require relay valves or dual-acting valves, which are costly and space-intensive, making them undesirable for simple and reliable operation.

Innovation Solution

An electropneumatic parking brake module design that eliminates the need for relay valves by using an inlet-outlet valve unit with 3/2-way valves and a pneumatically controlled pilot control unit, allowing direct connection and ventilation of spring brake cylinders, with optional 2/2-way check valves for graduated aeration and ventilation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If relay valves are used to supply compressed air to spring brake cylinders, then the brake system can reliably actuate parking brakes, but the device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliable actuation of parking brakeVSAvoidcomplexity of valve system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the functions of the relay valve and control valve into a single integrated valve unit. This merging eliminates the need for separate relay valves while maintaining the ability to reliably actuate parking brakes through coordinated control of air supply and venting paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control valve is designed to perform multiple functions: it acts as both a control valve for graduated brake application and as a relay valve for supplying compressed air to the spring brake cylinders. This multi-functionality reduces the overall number of components while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If dual-acting valves with pneumatic and electric control inputs are used, then direct control of spring brake cylinders is achieved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect control of brake cylindersVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity of valve
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two separate but coordinated valves: a control valve with electric actuator for graduated brake application, and a relay valve for air supply control. This segmentation allows each valve to be simpler in design while collectively achieving direct control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control valve acts as an intermediary between the electric control system and the relay valve. It receives electric control signals and translates them into pneumatic control actions that operate the relay valve, thereby achieving direct control without requiring the relay valve itself to have electric control inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If tristable solenoid valves are used to eliminate relay valves, then device complexity is reduced, but the valve size and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of valve componentsVSAvoidsize of solenoid valve
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a single large tristable solenoid valve, the patent merges the functionality into two smaller valves: a control valve with electric actuator and a relay valve. This approach achieves the same component reduction goal while keeping individual valve sizes manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution simplifies the module structure, reduces production costs and space requirements, while ensuring reliable maintenance of the spring brake state and enabling efficient brake application and ventilation without the need for complex valves.

Implementation Method 1

the inlet-outlet valve unit is in the second switching position if the first control pressure is below a first threshold value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure control: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

an electropneumatic pilot control unit for outputting at least a first control pressure at the inlet-outlet valve unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectropneumatic conversion:

Implementation Method 3

Spring brakes can be used as parking brakes and have a fault-prone brake actuator which activates the brake in a pressure-free manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11400906B2Electropneumatic parking brake with directly controlled valves
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 ZF CV SYST EURO BV
  • US11400906B2 patent drawing
  • US11400906B2 patent drawing
  • US11400906B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electropneumatic parking brake module (1) includes a supply connection (2), a spring-type actuator connection (4), an inlet-outlet valve unit (10) having a first switching position and a second switching position, and an electropneumatic pilot control unit (12) for outputting at least a first control pressure (p1) at the inlet-outlet valve unit (10). In the first switching position of the inlet-outlet valve unit (10), a spring brake pressure (pF) can be fed through directly from the supply connection (2) to the spring-type actuator connection (4) by virtue of the fact that the spring-type actuator connection (4) is connected to the supply connection (2), and, in the second switching position of the inlet-outlet valve unit (10), when the first control pressure (p1) is below a first threshold value, the spring-type actuator connection (4) is connected to a ventilating connection (14.3) of the inlet-outlet valve unit (10).