Electrostatic Actuator Protruding Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrostatic actuators face challenges in achieving a large driving force while maintaining a compact size and reducing the driving voltage, due to limitations in electrode design and machining accuracy, which complicates fine control and increases the device's size.

Innovation Solution

The electrostatic actuator features a stator and mover with protruding electrodes on their surfaces, where side surfaces of the electrodes face each other, and planar electrodes are used to increase the facing area, allowing for a larger electrostatic force generation with reduced voltage and size, and includes a conductor pattern for efficient signal application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the facing area between electrodes is increased to generate larger electrostatic force, then the driving force is improved, but the device size becomes larger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrostatic forceVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from planar electrode facing to three-dimensional protruding electrode configuration. By making electrodes protrude from the stator and mover surfaces, the facing area is extended into the third dimension (height direction), significantly increasing the electrostatic force generation area without increasing the planar footprint of the device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The electrode structure is segmented into multiple protruding elements arranged in arrays. Instead of using a single large planar electrode, the invention divides the electrode into numerous smaller protruding electrodes that can be densely packed, increasing the total facing area while maintaining a compact overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If the gap size between electrodes is decreased to increase electrostatic force, then the driving force is improved, but the machining accuracy requirement becomes more stringent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrostatic forceVSAvoidmachining accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By extending electrodes in the height direction rather than reducing the gap between planar surfaces, the invention achieves larger electrostatic force without requiring ultra-precise gap control. The protruding structure provides mechanical tolerance compensation and reduces sensitivity to gap variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Force

If the applied voltage is increased to generate larger electrostatic force, then the driving force is improved, but the breakdown voltage and power supply limitations arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrostatic forceVSAvoidbreakdown voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The three-dimensional protruding electrode structure increases the effective facing area and electrostatic force without requiring higher operating voltages. The increased surface area compensates for the lower voltage, allowing operation within safe breakdown voltage limits while maintaining high driving force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Force

If the area of each electrode on the stator is increased to increase facing area, then the electrostatic force is improved, but the fine control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrostatic forceVSAvoidfine control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode is divided into multiple smaller protruding elements that can be independently controlled. This segmentation enables fine control by selectively activating specific electrode groups while maintaining large total facing area through the cumulative effect of all protruding electrodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By extending electrodes vertically rather than expanding their planar area, the invention achieves large facing area without reducing the number of controllable electrode elements. The three-dimensional structure preserves control granularity while increasing force generation capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the electrostatic force between electrodes, enabling a larger driving force with reduced voltage and device size, improving the actuator's efficiency and control precision.

Implementation Method 1

the electrostatic force is proportional to a square of the applied voltage and the facing area between electrodes, and is inversely proportional to a gap size between the electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

an electrostatic actuator that can provide a large driving force by generating a large electrostatic force (a Coulomb force) is needed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoulomb force: Coulomb's Law

Data Source

PatentUS7579747B2Electrostatic actuator
Publication Date: 2009.08.25 ALPS ALPINE CO LTD
  • US7579747B2 patent drawing
  • US7579747B2 patent drawing
  • US7579747B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electrostatic actuator includes a stator having a plurality of protruding electrodes formed on a surface of a base material, where the surface serves as a counter surface, and a mover disposed so as to face the stator, where the mover has a plurality of protruding electrodes formed on a surface of a base material and the surface serves as a counter surface. A side surface of each of the protruding electrodes of the stator faces a side surface of a corresponding one of the protruding electrodes of the mover. Planar electrodes are formed on at least one of the counter surface of the stator and the counter surface of the mover in a portion other than a portion where the protruding electrodes are formed, and the planar electrodes face end surfaces of the protruding electrodes formed on the other counter surface.