Elevator Brake Failure Detection via Torque Imbalance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current elevator systems face challenges in ensuring safety against free fall due to potential brake failures, despite existing redundancies, as new building codes require additional safeguards against such hazards.

Innovation Solution

The elevator system includes methods to recognize brake failures by temporarily hovering the car to allow evacuation, controllably moving it based on weight and torque imbalances, and confirming brake functionality through tests, allowing safe placement back in service or controlled descent if necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If redundancy is built into electro-mechanical brakes to prevent free fall, then safety against free fall is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against free fallVSAvoidbrake system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary brake verification by temporarily hovering the elevator car after brake activation to confirm proper brake engagement before allowing normal operation to continue. This preliminary check prevents undetected brake failures from causing free fall incidents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by monitoring whether the elevator car remains stationary after brake activation. If the car moves when it should be held stationary, the system detects brake failure and triggers appropriate safety responses, including preventing door opening and alerting maintenance personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the elevator car is temporarily hovered in place to allow evacuation, then passenger safety is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safetyVSAvoidevacuation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification of brake failure by hovering the car temporarily to confirm the brake cannot hold the car stationary. Only after confirming actual brake failure does the system initiate evacuation procedures, avoiding unnecessary evacuations for minor issues while ensuring safety when truly needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically manages the hover and evacuation process without requiring manual intervention. The controller autonomously determines when brake failure is confirmed, initiates the hover sequence, and manages evacuation, reducing both time loss and human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If the elevator car is controllably moved to top or bottom of hoistway, then brake failure confirmation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake failure detection accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system utilizes the existing counterweight mechanism to controllably move the elevator car to the top or bottom of the hoistway for brake verification. By leveraging the counterweight system already present in the elevator, no additional complex positioning equipment is needed, maintaining simplicity while achieving precise verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The elevator car's own drive system and counterweight mechanism perform the verification movement autonomously under controller direction. The system uses its existing components to execute the verification sequence, eliminating the need for external testing equipment or complex additional mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances safety by ensuring brakes function correctly, meeting new building code requirements without the need for additional hardware, thus being cost-effective and ensuring passenger safety in case of brake failures.

Implementation Method 1

torque applied to the elevator car for driving the elevator car upwardly or downwardly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque: Torque

Implementation Method 2

electro-mechanical brakes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectro-mechanical conversion:

Implementation Method 3

hydraulic-mechanical brakes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 4

relative weights of the elevator car and a counter-weight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS20240383724A1Elevator system with brake failure responses
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 OTIS ELEVATOR CO
  • US20240383724A1 patent drawing
  • US20240383724A1 patent drawing
  • US20240383724A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating an elevator system is provided and includes recognizing that brakes of an elevator car fail to drop upon brake power being removed, temporarily hovering the elevator car in place to allow the elevator car to be emptied, controllably moving the elevator car in a direction of imbalance, which is defined in terms of relative weights of the elevator car and a counter-weight and torque applied to the elevator car for driving the elevator car upwardly or downwardly, to either a top or a bottom of a hoistway and confirming that the brakes are failing to drop or provide sufficient holding torque.