Engine Control System Fuel Reactivity Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Engine systems face challenges in calibrating fuel quality variations, leading to issues like high turbine inlet temperatures, detonation, and NOx emissions out of compliance due to unknown or varying fuel qualities, which conventional methods struggle to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

An engine control method and system that adjusts pilot fuel quantity and air-to-fuel ratio based on NOx and exhaust temperature error values, using closed-loop control to maintain optimal engine performance across varying fuel qualities, eliminating the need for multiple flash files.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple flash files with separate performance calibration adjustments are used to cover different fuel qualities, then the engine can be calibrated for various fuel types, but the device complexity increases and requires frequent recalibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel quality coverageVSAvoidnumber of flash files
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from discrete flash files to continuous parameter adjustment. The control system dynamically modifies fuel injection parameters, air-to-fuel ratio, and combustion timing based on measured exhaust gas composition, allowing adaptation to any fuel quality within the operating range without requiring pre-programmed flash files for each fuel type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by continuously monitoring exhaust gas composition (CO, CO2, O2, NOx) and using this information to automatically adjust fuel injection and air intake parameters. This feedback mechanism enables real-time adaptation to varying fuel qualities, eliminating the need for manual flash file selection and recalibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If fuel quality information is requested from supplier or tested upon arrival, then the fuel quality can be identified, but the time consumption increases and may not be readily available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel quality informationVSAvoidtime to obtain fuel quality data
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-characterization of fuel quality by analyzing its own exhaust gas composition during operation. Instead of relying on external fuel quality data from suppliers or laboratory testing, the engine control system autonomously determines fuel properties (such as cetane number or methane number) by measuring exhaust parameters and inferring fuel characteristics from the combustion results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If hand tuning and official IMO measurement are performed for each fuel quality, then accurate calibration can be achieved, but the time and resource requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces time-consuming hand tuning and official IMO measurements with automated feedback control. By continuously monitoring exhaust gas composition and adjusting fuel injection and air intake parameters in real-time, the system achieves accurate calibration automatically during normal operation, eliminating the need for extensive manual tuning procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The engine control system performs self-calibration by using its own operational data (exhaust composition, load, speed) to automatically determine optimal fuel injection parameters. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external calibration services and official IMO measurements for each fuel type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If the engine is not calibrated according to specific fuel quality, then operation can continue, but harmful factors increase including high turbine inlet temperatures, detonation, and NOx emissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine operation continuityVSAvoidemissions and temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system prevents harmful operating conditions by continuously monitoring exhaust gas composition and using this feedback to adjust fuel injection and air intake parameters. When fuel quality varies from the calibrated state, the feedback control automatically modifies combustion parameters to maintain optimal turbine inlet temperature, prevent detonation, and control NOx emissions within regulatory limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11306669B1System, apparatus, and method for controlling an engine system to account for varying fuel quality
Publication Date: 2022.04.19 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US11306669B1 patent drawing
  • US11306669B1 patent drawing
  • US11306669B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, apparatus, and method for controlling an engine system can provide fuel reactivity compensation control for an engine of the engine system. The control can include controlling pilot fuel quantity supplied to an engine based on a pilot fuel offset value; and controlling air-to-fuel ratio (AFR) for the engine based on an AFR control trim value. A NOx error value can be used to generate one of the pilot fuel offset value or the AFR control trim value, and an exhaust temperature error value can be used to generate the other of the pilot fuel offset value or the AFR control trim value.